That is what the banker began by doing at the very origins of this
institution of banking. It was a little odd. It was not quite
straightforward. But the depositors, most of them, knew what was going
on, and at any rate did not protest. And if, when a profit was made out
of their combined money, they got some of that profit, they were glad
enough to see that their money had been put to some use and that they
had become richer by its use; while if they had kept it to themselves
in scattered small amounts it would not have made them any richer.
In England we can trace the origins of a great many banks, and of the
fortunes of their owners, proceeding along these lines. For instance:
there was a family of silversmiths rather more than two hundred years
ago. They had a shop in which silver objects were bought and sold, and
they also had gold plate to buy and sell. They had strong-boxes in
which these things were kept, and they paid money to men who guarded
these strong-boxes. It was a natural thing for people to go to this
shop and say: “I have here a thousand pounds in gold which is not very
safe at home. Will you look after it for me, on condition of course
that I may call for any amount of it when I want it and what will you
charge for your trouble?” The silversmiths said: “Yes, we will do this,
we will charge nothing,” and in that way they got hold of very large
sums which people left with them. They found, as we have just seen,
that in practice, year after year, only a certain amount of the sums
were required of them at any one time, and rather than leave the big
balance lying idle they used it for buying useful things which would
produce more wealth. They lent the money sometimes to the State for its
purposes, that is, to the King of the time. Sometimes they employed it
in other ways which earned a profit. The people who left the money
with them always found that they could get back whatever they wanted
when they asked for it, and they were content. That is how banking
arose.
Another example of which I know the history and which is very
interesting is that of a squire in the West of England who lived rather
less than two hundred years ago and has given his name to one of our
great banks still existing to-day. This squire was a rich man who
had many friends coming to his table. He had the reputation of good
judgment and his friends would say: “I will leave this sum of money in
your custody,” for they knew that he would be able to put it to good
use and give them part of the profit. Thus, looking after the money of
neighbours, he came to look after the money of a great many people whom
his neighbours recommended, and at last had hundreds of “clients,” as
the phrase went--that is, of people who would leave their money with
him, knowing that he would earn a profit both for himself and for them;
at the same time the money would be safely kept, and they might call
for a portion of it whenever they wanted it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account