In process of time the thing was simplified. In place of the letter
came the shortened form, the cheque, and you wrote: “Pay £20 to John
Jones or order,” and John Jones, instead of sending a letter signed
by himself, merely put his signature at the back of the cheque. This
was called “endorsement,” which is a Latin form of the English meaning
“putting one’s name on the back of anything.” A cheque “endorsed” with
the name “John Jones,” that is, with John Jones’s name signed on the
back of it, was paid by the bank to whomever John Jones might send to
receive the payment. My cheque asking for £20 to be paid to John Jones
having fulfilled its object, and the £20 being paid to whomever John
Jones had sent after he had “endorsed” that cheque, the cheque was said
to have been “honoured” by the bank. The word “honoured” meant that the
bank had admitted that I had the money banked with them, and that they
were bound to hand it over on seeing my signature asking that it should
be handed over.
The convenience of cheques used in this way for business was obvious.
If I owed a man £20 and I had £1,000 with my banker, instead of having
to draw out twenty sovereigns myself and take them to him, all I had
to do was to write out a cheque to the order of this man, who would
endorse it and get the money.
Now as banking grew and came to deal with more and more people, it was
probable that this man, Jones, would have a banking account too with
somebody. If Mr. Smith was not his banker, then Mr. Brown would be.
As we have seen, people not only drew out money from the original sum
they had deposited at the bank, they also paid in money as they got
it, on account of the convenience of having it looked after safely. So
when John Jones got my cheque for £20, he often did not get the actual
cash from my banker, Mr. Smith, but simply gave in the cheque, endorsed
by him, to Mr. Brown, _his_ banker, and said: “Get this from Mr. Smith,
the other banker, and add it to the sum which I have banked with you,
Mr. Brown.” The banker Brown did this, and the cheque which I had
originally signed in favour of John Jones, having gone the rounds, was
sent back to me to prove that the transaction was complete.
As banking continued to grow this system took on a vast extension.
Thousands and thousands of people paid, and were paid, by cheques, of
which only a small part were turned into cash, and of which much the
greater part were paid into the bankers’ offices and then settled by
the bankers among themselves.
After many years of this system it became apparent that the enormous
transactions, thousands of cheques all crossing each other daily in
hundreds of ways, could be simplified by the establishment of what came
to be called the “Clearing House.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account