2. The banks, especially in England, are all in one combination and
keep detailed information upon all of us. Not only have they control
over industry through their power to make or withhold the money which
they alone can now create and hand out to those they favour, but they
also keep indexes of detailed information as thorough and widespread
as those of any Government office. They have a secret service more
widespread and powerful than that of the State, and this hidden power
of theirs, though private and concealed knowledge, irritates plain men
more and more. People feel that they are not free, and that the banking
system, which is international in essence, is a universal and hidden
master.
Therefore all over the world to-day people are saying: “The banking
system, and the few men who direct it, are altogether too powerful.
They control our lives. They are beginning to control the public policy
of the State, especially in England, and there ought to be a national
authority superior to them and keeping them in order.”
A great many schemes have lately been on all sides proposed to
establish such a superior authority. Thus, we have in England a very
powerful movement in favour of what is called the “Douglas Scheme
of Credit,” and of course the Socialists, with their ideas of State
control of everything, would also put an end to the private power of
the banking system. Then there are those who want to have a strong King
who would be able to override any lesser power in the State, including
the bankers.[5] But the points to seize in understanding the political
economy of our time are those I have just been describing to you: what
the banking system is, how it arose, how unnaturally powerful it has
become, and why a universal revolt is arising against it.
There will be a struggle inevitably between the banking, or financial,
interest and the people all over civilised countries: but no one can
tell which will win. In industrial countries the odds are in favour of
the banks, or financiers. In peasant countries against them.
NATIONAL LOANS AND TAXATION
Every country must, to carry on its national services, raise taxes
from its citizens, and those taxes, though levied in money, translate
themselves, of course, into goods, that is, economic values attached to
material objects.
We say that the State “raises,” say, a hundred million pounds in
taxation from its citizens a year, for “State Purposes”; and when you
come to look into what is actually got by the State and how the State
uses what it has got, it means that the State levies so many boots and
so much bread, and so much housing material and so much clothing, and
spends this again in maintaining State servants, that is, in clothing
and housing and feeding soldiers and policemen, and civil servants and
school teachers, and so on.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account