The “National Debt”--as it came to be called--remained a permanent
institution, in connection with which all the citizens had to be taxed
in order to provide interest for the rich lenders. Latterly these
burdens of national debt have become overwhelming, and at the present
moment about a twelfth of everything that English people produce is
taken from them and handed over as interest to the comparatively few
wealthy residents in England and abroad who lent great sums to the
Government during the war.
It is true that whenever a loan is raised the Government provides not
only interest but what is called a “sinking fund”--that is, an extra
amount of taxation every year which is dedicated to paying back the
whole of the loan slowly. But long before a loan is paid off some new
occasion arises compelling the Government to borrow again on a large
scale, and the total debt perpetually increases.
The result is that all the great modern European nations are now
loaded with a debt really larger than any of them can bear, and that
therefore they have all taken steps to lighten that burden by various
tricks not at all straightforward. Some of them pay back in money
which appears the same as the money which they borrowed, but which has
a very different value. They have borrowed for a war, say, £1,000,
representing 100 tons of wheat. Then they debase the currency, so that
a sum still called £1,000 will only buy 20 tons of wheat, and in this
way they can pretend to pay the lender back, although they are really
cheating him of four-fifths of what he lent. Two countries, Germany
and Russia, have pushed this so far that the lenders are now not
really paid anything at all. A man who lent the German Government, for
carrying on the war, money which during the war would have bought a
million tons of wheat, is now (October, 1923) paid back in money called
by the same name but able only to purchase a tenth of a ton--which is
the same as saying that he is not paid back at all.
Of all European countries that fought in the war our own has been the
most honest in this matter, but even in England a man who lent the
equivalent of 1,000 sheep, say, and who was promised interest at the
rate of 50 sheep a year, is only getting 25 sheep a year on account of
the change in the value of money.
In this matter of loans we must distinguish between _internal loans_
and _external loans_. An _internal loan_ is borrowed from one’s own
people. It involves taxing and impoverishing one set of citizens in
order to pay interest to and enrich another set. But the country as a
whole is no poorer. An _external_ loan is borrowed from foreigners, and
the interest on it is dead loss to the country. Also, it cannot be paid
in debased currency. A government can cheat its own nationals by paying
them in false money. But it has to pay foreign lenders in real money. A
foreign loan is real. It must be (as a rule) paid in gold. England thus
pays millions a year to America.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account