Had Burns lived till 1802, who knows to what his politics might have led
him? He would then have been still only in his forty-fourth year; and
what fate more imaginable for him, had he been still alive, than that,
deprived of his gaugership, or throwing it up, he should have left
Dumfries for Edinburgh, and, associating himself there with the many who
would have welcomed him, and with whom, whatever their rank, there was
no fear that his relations would have ever been other than those of
perfect equality, he should have become the editor, mayhap, of a Whig
newspaper? If so, who can doubt that prose would have become easier to
him, that he would have been a power among the Scottish Whigs, and that
his influence would have been felt, in his new character, by them and by
the nation? Ah! and, had he lived on through all their coming struggles,
would he not have been but seventy-three years of age at the time of the
passing of the Reform Bill; and, in gratitude to him as a veteran Whig
and ex-editor, might not his fellow-citizens at last have returned him
to the House of Commons as the senior colleague of young
Macaulay?—“Profanation! profanation!” is the cry that will rise to all
Scottish lips on the mere muttering of such a fancy. Nature herself had
been of that opinion. Burns had died in 1796, in the thirty-eighth year
of his age, a broken-down exciseman, in Dumfries; and he was to be
remembered to all eternity,—thank God!—simply as Robert Burns.
The required party-standard was raised by the young Whigs of Edinburgh.
It was in Jeffrey’s humble domicile, in an upper storey in one of the
houses of Buccleuch Place, that, on one memorable day in the year 1802,
Sydney Smith first started the idea of a new periodical, combining
literature with politics, to be published quarterly, and kept up by
contributions from the teeming minds of the members of the Speculative
Society. No sooner said than done: Constable at once undertook the
publication; and on the 10th of October 1802 the first number of the
_Edinburgh Review_ saw the light. For a number or two the editorship was
the joint-occupation of Sydney Smith, Jeffrey, Horner, Brougham, and a
few others,—Sydney Smith officiating in chief; but, on Smith’s return to
London soon afterwards, the management fell exclusively on Jeffrey.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account