In 1719 there was published in Edinburgh, in a tract of twelve folio
pages, a small poem, 27 stanzas or 216 lines long, entitled _Hardyknute,
a Fragment_. It was printed in old spelling, to look like a piece of old
Scottish poetry that had somehow been recovered; and it seems to have
been accepted as such by those into whose hands the copy had come, and
who were concerned in having it published. Among these were Duncan
Forbes of Culloden, afterwards Lord President of the Court of Session,
and Sir Gilbert Elliott of Minto, afterwards Lord Justice-Clerk; but
there is something like proof that it had come into their hands
indirectly from Sir John Hope Bruce of Kinross, baronet, who died as
late as 1766 at a great age, in the rank of lieutenant-general, and who,
some time before 1719, had sent a manuscript copy of it to Lord Binning,
with a fantastic story to the effect that the original, in a much
defaced vellum, had been found, a few weeks before, in a vault at
Dunfermline.
The little thing, having become popular in its first published form, was
reproduced in 1724 by Allan Ramsay in his _Evergreen_, which professed
to be “a collection of Scots Poems wrote by the ingenious before 1600”;
but it there appeared with corrections and some additional stanzas. In
1740 it had the honour of a new appearance in London, under anonymous
editorship, and with the title “Hardyknute, a Fragment; being the first
Canto of an Epick Poem: with general remarks and notes.” The anonymous
editor, still treating it as a genuine old poem, of not later than the
sixteenth century, praises it very highly. “There is a grandeur, a
majesty of sentiment,” he says, “diffused through the whole: a true
sublime, which nothing can surpass.” It was but natural that a piece of
which this could be said should be included by Percy in his _Reliques of
Ancient English Poetry_, published in 1765. It appeared, accordingly, in
the first edition of that famous book, still as an old poem and in
antique spelling; and it was reprinted in the subsequent editions issued
by Percy himself in 1767, 1775, and 1794, though then with some added
explanations and queries.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account