Editorials from the Hearst NewspapersBrisbane, Arthur
Philosophy
Editorials from the Hearst Newspapers
Brisbane, Arthur
Editorials; Essays
The trusts will soon own all the industries, all the
manufactures, and they will want freedom from the duties which
are now paid on the material.
Already there is in process of formation a great Clothing Trust.
The small man who makes clothing now must pay a duty on wool to
protect the American farmer who raises sheep.
How long do you think the Clothing Trust will tolerate this duty
on wool?
How long do you think the Trust engaged in making cloths in
America will tolerate a duty on wool that makes the industry so
expensive?
Some of the duties will be retained, of course--at least until
the trusts shall be powerful enough even to despise foreign
competition.
But one thing after another the trusts will want free from duty,
and these things will be freed as fast as the trusts' order is
given. ----
The trusts are going to do a great deal of good to the masses of
the people in time. They will end by forcing universal
Government ownership of monopolies upon the people.
TRUSTS WILL DRIVE LABOR UNIONS INTO POLITICS
A workman should use the best tools at his command--the
workman's best tool is his ballot. Everything that men want it
can give them if used intelligently. The reasons urged against
its use by labor unions are conscientious but not strong. They
are based upon the fact that labor men fear to trust each other,
and fear especially to trust their leaders. They will not vote
as unions because they fear that they may be sold out--that is
the plain, unpleasant fact.
We cannot believe that their fears are well founded. We know
that leaders both able and honest can be found among American
workingmen, and we say that they should be found and trusted
promptly. ----
For mark this:
THE TRUSTS WILL INEVITABLY COMPEL THE LABOR UNIONS TO BECOME
POLITICAL UNIONS.
TRUSTS WILL MAKE IT CLEAR TO UNIONS THAT THEIR ONLY HOPE IS IN
POLITICAL ACTION WHICH SHALL GIVE THEM THE POWER TO CONTROL
LEGISLATION.
When individual firms are competing the injustice of one firm may
be punished and controlled by a strike.
THE TRUST WILL RENDER THE STRIKE LAUGHABLE AND USELESS.
Suppose all the shops or manufactories of a certain kind to be
under the control of one trust. What good will a strike do? The
concern in which the strike occurs will simply stop work. Its
business will go to other concerns in the trust; the firm in
which the strike occurs will calmly draw its share of the trust
profits and laugh at the strikers. The latter will lose their
wages and time--no one else will lose anything.
What does one paper mill care for a strike if all the other mills
in the Paper Trust are running, and making the money which it
nominally loses? ----
Perhaps the workingmen think they can stop ALL the manufactures
of a certain kind. In the first place they probably cannot--with
trusts that reach across 3,000 miles of country.
And if they could, what about the TRUST OF TRUSTS?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account