Education: How Old The NewWalsh, James J. (James Joseph)
History
Education: How Old The New
Walsh, James J. (James Joseph)
Education -- History
"Yet there has always in generous souls who have some tincture of
philosophy, subsisted a curious kind of sympathy and yearning over
the work of these generations of mainly disinterested scholars, who,
whatever they were, were {121} thorough, and whatever they could not
do, could think. And there have even, in these latter days, been
some graceless ones who have asked whether the science of the
nineteenth century, after an equal interval, will be of any more
positive value--whether it will not have even less comparative
interest than that which appertains to the scholasticism of the
thirteenth."
I have always considered, however, that the easiest way to show the
modern student of science how supremely scientific in his temper was
St. Thomas, is to quote for him the passage from that great teacher
with regard to the Resurrection. In every way, that is typically
modern. St. Thomas faces the question that after death men's bodies
decay, the material of them is taken up and used in many other living
beings, so that how can we dare to believe that we shall rise again on
the last day with the same bodies that we now have? St. Thomas
discusses this knotty problem straightforwardly and solves it more
satisfactorily, even for all the knowledge that we have of it now,
than has ever been done.
"What does not bar numerical unity in a man while he lives on
uninterruptedly clearly can be no bar to the identity of the arisen
man with the man that was. In a man's body while he lives there are
not only the same parts in respect of matter, but also in respect of
species. In respect of matter there is a flux and reflux of parts.
Still that fact does not bar the man's numerical unity {122} from
the beginning to the end of his life. The form and species of the
several parts continue throughout life, but the matter of the parts
is dissolved by the natural heat, and new matter accrues through
nourishment. Yet the man is not numerically different by the
difference of his component parts at different ages, although it is
true that the material composition of the man at one stage of his
life is not his material composition at another. Addition is made
from without to the stature of a boy without prejudice to his
identity, for the boy and the adult are numerically the same man."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account