Egypt of the Pharaohs and of the KhedivéZincke, F. Barham (Foster Barham)
History
Egypt of the Pharaohs and of the Khedivé
Zincke, F. Barham (Foster Barham)
Egypt -- Description and travel; Egypt -- History
If the question be asked—Why we do ourselves believe in a future
life?—the answer is—That we believe in it for the same reason that Homer
and Virgil, Cheops and Darius, Porus, Arminius, and Galgacus believed in
it—that is to say, because our remote, but common ancestors, had passed
out of the state in which thought is chaos, and had reached the state in
which thought has begun to organize itself; and because the vertebral
column of the form in which it had with them begun to organize itself
was belief in a future state. None of all of us, whether dwellers on the
banks of the Ganges, the Thames, or the Nile, could any more get rid
of, or dispense with, or act independently of, that formative column of
thought, than our animal constitution could of its formative column of
bone. Belief in God, in moral distinctions, in personal responsibility,
in the supremacy of intelligence—that is to say, that it is intelligence
which orders, and co-ordinates God, the universe, and man, would all be
powerless and unmeaning, were it not for this belief in a future life.
These, and others beliefs may feed and support it; but it acts in, and
through them, and gives them their chief value. It puts man in permanent
relation with God, and the universe. Hitherto with us nothing else has
done this. Without it these other beliefs would have been mere chaotic
elements of thought.
We must see this in order that we may understand the life, the mind,
and even the arts of the ancient Egyptians. Nothing about them is
intelligible if their belief in a future life is lost sight of; for this
it was that made them what they were, and enabled them to do what they
did. The connexion with it of their greatest achievement is close and
evident. As an instrument of human progress, language, of course, takes
precedence of everything. Nothing would be possible without it. But, if
man had stopped short at the acquisition of language, not much would have
been gained. Something more was needed, and that something was the art of
writing, which is that extension of the uses of language, without which
no serviceable amount of knowledge could have been attained, or retained.
Without this little could have been done. With it everything became
possible. The further we advance by its aid, the longer, and the broader,
and the more glorious are the vistas that open before us. Now, of this
we are certain, that the ancient Egyptians discovered this art. The idea
of the possibility of speaking words to the mind through the eye, and
rendering thought fixed, and permanent, and portable, and transmissible
from generation to generation, of committing it, not to the air, but to
stone, or, still better, to paper, first occurred to the Egyptians. And
they were the first to give effect to the idea, which they did in their
hieroglyphic form of writing, out of which afterwards grew the hieratic
and demotic forms.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account