Egypt of the Pharaohs and of the KhedivéZincke, F. Barham (Foster Barham)
History
Egypt of the Pharaohs and of the Khedivé
Zincke, F. Barham (Foster Barham)
Egypt -- Description and travel; Egypt -- History
The next question is, who were the Israelites? We are now regarding the
question singly from the historical point of view, just as we should
the question of who were the Lydians, the Etruscans, the Dorians, or
any other people of antiquity? There is no question but that they were
substantially a Semitic people, mainly of the same race, and of the same
dispositions and capacities as the other branches of the Semitic stock,
as for instance, the Phœnicians, and the Moabites of the old, and the
Arabs of the modern world. It is clear, however, and this is a point of
some importance, that they were not of unmixed Semitic blood. Abraham
came from Ur of the Chaldees, and was therefore a Chaldean, whatever
that appellative stood for at that time. The Hebrew Scriptures describe
him as a Syrian. He can, therefore hardly be regarded as of pure Semitic
descent. Furthermore, when the people left Egypt they must have had
in their veins a large infusion of Egyptian, that is old Aryan blood,
somewhat mixed with Ethiopian. This must have been the case, because
during their sojourn in Egypt there had been no disinclination among them
to intermarry with Egyptians. Joseph had had for his wife a high-caste
Egyptian woman, Amenath, the daughter of Potipherah, priest of On; and
the wife of Moses is called a Cushite, or Ethiopian woman. Besides this,
we are told that when the people—their blood being already mixed in this
way with that of the semi-Aryan Egyptians—went up out of Egypt, there
went out with them a mixed multitude, which can only mean Egyptians, who
cast in their lot with them, or a remnant of the Hyksos, who had stayed
behind at the time of the expulsion of the main body, or the descendants
of the Asiatic captives of Sethos and Rameses, and their predecessors. I
need not go to the Egyptian accounts. The above facts will be sufficient
for our present purpose. They enable us historically to understand
the people. They were of mixed descent, of very composite blood. The
preponderant element was Semitic, but that had been enriched by large
additions of better blood; still, however, not to such an extent as to
efface, or even to any decisive degree alter the Semitic characteristics.
The mental capacity and vigour, the apprehensiveness and receptiveness of
the people, had been increased, but still they were in the main Semitic;
in language, in sentiment, in cast and direction of thought.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account