The other pateræ resemble these as far as the technique and decoration
are concerned: they evidently came from the same workshop and belonged
to one owner. Were they for daily use or only for ornament? It would
seem that they were not fashioned for a definite use: at least they
do not recall the shapes seen on the monuments in the hands of guests
at a banquet or of priests in the sacrifices. They were hung on the
walls of halls, or placed on sideboards on fête-days, and if they were
given to the guests, it was not simply for them to eat or drink out of.
Filled with fresh water or clear wine, it was a sort of miniature lake,
in the centre of which the point of the gold hat rose like an islet:
the landscape and figures, seen through the transparent medium, stood
out on the flat background with peculiar vivacity, and were effaced or
deformed at pleasure when the liquid was disturbed. It is not so long
since we were pleased with similar puerilities, and Orientals do not
disdain them to-day: the pateræ were, perhaps, toys rather than objects
of real utility. I shall not say the same of the silver strainers,
the forms of which are elegant but not overladen with ornament, and
evidently intended for use. A wide opened funnel, a plaque at the
bottom pierced with tiny little holes--the handle alone testifies to
any artistic attempt--an open papyrus flower, the petals of which, bent
over the stem, lean on the rim of the funnel. It is a useful implement
for kitchen or cellar, well adapted to its end, easy to keep clean, in
a word practical, a thing in truth that the pateræ are not.
V
It is clear, then, that the interest of the find is great in itself
on account of the number and beauty of the objects. Until now the
greater part of the goldsmiths’ work we possess was of the Ptolemaic
period, and those that could be attributed with certainty to the
Pharaonic period possessed no characteristics that permitted us to
judge the skill of the Egyptians. The pictures on the walls of tombs
or temples authorize our belief that it was very skilful, but the
conventions of their designs are still so ill-defined that there is not
always agreement about their interpretation. It is even necessary to
ask if certain motives figuring outside a vase ought not to be taken
as belonging to the decoration of the inside. We now have a sufficient
number of their works to justify our conjecture, and to declare in all
sincerity that the goldsmiths were in no way inferior to the sculptors,
at least so long as the second Theban Empire lasted.
[Illustration: THE BOTTOM OF ONE OF THE ZAGAZIG SILVER PATERÆ.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account