Let us consider the atom of hydrogen, the lightest and simplest of
the gases. We know that it consists of one planet only, one single
negative electron revolving round the minute central sun, the positive
nucleus. We know also that the mass of the electron is two thousand
times as small as that of the hydrogen atom. It follows, as we can
calculate, that the _positive nucleus_ must have a radius two
thousand times smaller than that of the electron. Now, the experiments
of the English physicists have proved that the large Alpha particles of
the radium emanation can pass through hundreds of thousands of atoms
without being appreciably diverted by the positive nucleus. We conclude
that the latter is in reality much smaller than the electron, as theory
predicted.
All this irresistibly compels us to think that the inertia of the
various component parts of atoms—that is to say, of all matter—is
exclusively electro-magnetic in origin. There is now no matter. There
is only electrical energy, which, by the reactions of the surrounding
medium upon it, leads us to the fallacious belief in the existence of
this substantial and massive something which hundreds of generations
have been wont to call “matter.”
And from all this it also follows, by calculation and by the simple and
elegant reasoning of Einstein, of which I here convey only the faintest
adumbration, that mass and energy are the same thing, or are at least
the two different sides of one and the same coin. There is, then, no
longer a material mass. There is nothing but energy in the external
universe. A strange—in a sense, an almost spiritual—turn for modern
physics to take!
According to all this the greater part of the “mass” of bodies must be
due to a considerable and concealed internal energy. It is this energy
which we find gradually dissipated in radio-active bodies, the only
reservoirs of atomic energy which have as yet opened externally.
If this is true, if energy and mass are synonymous, if mass is merely
energy, it follows that free energy must possess the property of mass.
As a matter of fact, light, for instance, has mass. Careful experiments
have shown that when a ray of light strikes a material object, it
exerts upon it a pressure which has been measured. Light has mass;
therefore it has weight, like all masses. When we come to consider the
new form given by Einstein to the problem of gravitation, we shall see
a further and beautiful proof that light has weight.
We can calculate that the light received from the sun by the earth in
the space of a year is rather more than 58,000 tons. It seems very
little when one thinks of the formidable weight of coal that would be
needed to maintain our globe at the temperature at which the sun keeps
it—in the event of a sudden extinction of our luminary.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account