The reason for the difference is that, when we produce heat from a
certain amount of coal, we use only a small proportion of its total
energy, its chemical energy. Its intra-atomic energy is inaccessible
to us. It is a pity, as otherwise we should need only a few ounces of
coal to supply heat for a whole year to all the towns and workshops
of England! How many problems that would simplify! When humanity
emerges from the ignorance and the clumsy barbarism in which it lives
to-day—that is to say, in some hundreds of centuries—this will be
accomplished. Yes, it will one day be done. It will be a glorious
spectacle, one in which we may justly rejoice in advance.
Meantime, our sun, like all the other stars, like every incandescent
body, loses its weight in proportion as it radiates. But this happens
so slowly that we need not fear to see it disappear at some early date,
like the ephemeral things which die because they gave themselves too
freely.
* * * * *
To finish with Einstein’s mechanics, let me reproduce a very suggestive
application of these ideas about the identity of energy and mass.
There is in chemistry a well-known elementary law which is called
“Prout’s Law.” It states that the atomic masses of all the elements
must be whole multiples of the mass of hydrogen. Since hydrogen has the
lightest atoms amongst all known bodies Prout’s Law started from the
hypothesis that all the atoms are built up of a fundamental element,
the atom of hydrogen. This supposed unity of matter seems to be more
and more confirmed by the facts. On the one hand, it is proved that the
electrons which come from different chemical elements are identical. On
the other hand, in the transformation of radio-active bodies we find
heavy atoms simplifying themselves by successively emitting atoms of
helium gas. Lastly, the great British physicist Sir Ernest Rutherford
showed in 1919 that by bombarding the atoms of nitrogen gas, in
certain circumstances, by means of radium emanation, we can detach
hydrogen atoms from them. This experiment, the importance of which has
not been fully realised—it is the first instance of transmutation
really effected by man—also tends to prove the soundness of Prout’s
hypothesis.
Yet, when we accurately measure and compare the atomic masses of the
various chemical elements, we find that they do not strictly conform to
Prout’s Law. For instance, while the atomic mass of hydrogen is 1, that
of chlorium is 35·46, which is not a whole multiple of 1.
But we can calculate that, if the formation of complex atoms from
hydrogen upwards is accompanied, as is probable, by variations of
internal energy, as a consequence of the radiation of a certain amount
of energy during the combination, it necessarily follows (since the
lost energy has weight) that there will be variations in the mass of
the body composed, and these will explain the known departures from
Prout’s Law.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account