Hence the stars on either side of the sun will, if Einstein is right,
be more widely separated from each other in the negatives taken during
the eclipse. In their normal position, on the photographs taken during
the night, they will seem nearer to each other.
This is precisely what was found when the photographs taken at Sobral
and Principe were studied with the aid of the micrometer. Not only was
it thus proved that the light of the stars is bent out of its path by
the sun, but it was found that the deviation had exactly the extent
which had been predicted by Einstein. It amounts to an angle of one
second and three-quarters (1″·75) in the case of a star that is quite
close to the sun’s disk, and the angle decreases rapidly in proportion
to the distance of stars from the sun. It was a great triumph for the
theory of Einstein, and for the first time it gave us some connecting
link between light and gravitation.
On the preceding page I compared the curvature of light owing to its
weight with the deviation that is caused by atmospheric refraction.
As a matter of fact, there were astronomers who wondered whether the
agreement between Einstein’s theory and the results obtained during the
eclipse was not merely a coincidence: whether the deviation that was
recorded was not due to refractive action by the sun’s atmosphere.
It seems impossible to admit this. Sometimes we see comets passing
quite close to the surface of the sun during their journey through
space. Their movement would be considerably disturbed if the sun’s
atmosphere were refractive enough to account for the deviations
observed at Sobral and Principe. Perturbations of cometary orbits of
this nature, near the sun, have never been recorded. The only possible
interpretation, therefore, is that the phenomena are due to the effect
of weight upon light.
Thus the light of the stars, weighed in a balance of the most
exquisite delicacy, has given us a decisive confirmation of Einstein’s
theoretical deductions. By its fruit we know the tree.
CHAPTER VI
THE NEW CONCEPTION OF GRAVITATION
_Geometry and reality—Euclid’s geometry and
others—Contingency of Poincaré’s criterion—The
real universe is not Euclidean but Riemannian—The
avatars of the number π—The point of view of the
drunken man—Straight and geodetic lines—The new
law of universal attraction—Explanation of the
anomaly of the planet Mercury—Einstein’s theory of
gravitation._
Does the universe conform to the laws of geometry? It is a question
that has been much discussed by philosophers and scholars, but the
deviation of light owing to its weight now enables us to approach it
with confidence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account