Einstein's Theories of Relativity and Gravitation: A selection of material from the essays submitted in the competition for the Eugene Higgins prize of $5,000Bird, J. Malcolm (James Malcolm)
Philosophy
Einstein's Theories of Relativity and Gravitation: A selection of material from the essays submitted in the competition for the Eugene Higgins prize of $5,000
Bird, J. Malcolm (James Malcolm)
Relativity (Physics)
Theoretically, one of these assumptions is as good as any other. Hence
we no longer believe in absolute space and time. This is of great
interest philosophically. Practically, it is unimportant, for,
unless our choice of an assumption is very wild, our conclusions and
measurements will agree substantially with those which are already
familiar.
Finally, the "general" relativity shows that gravitation and
electro-magnetic phenomena--(including light) do not form two
independent sides of nature, as we once supposed, but influence one
another (though slightly) and are parts of one greater whole.
XIX
EINSTEIN'S THEORY OF RELATIVITY
A Simple Explanation of His Postulates and Their Consequences
BY T. ROYDS, KODAIKANAL OBSERVATORY, INDIA
Einstein's theory of relativity seeks to represent to us the world as
it really is instead of the world of appearances which may be deceiving
us. When I was in town last week to buy 5 yards of calico I watched
the draper very carefully as he measured the cloth to make sure I was
not cheated. Yet experiment can demonstrate, and Einstein's theory
can explain, that the draper's yardstick became longer or shorter
according to the direction in which it was held. The length of the
yardstick did not appear to me to change simply because everything else
in the same direction, the store, the draper, the cloth, the retina
of my eye, changed length in the same ratio. Einstein's theory points
out not only this, but every case where appearances are deceptive,
and tries to show us the world of reality.
Einstein's theory is based on the principle of relativity and
before we try to follow his reasoning we must spend a little time
in understanding what he means by "relativity" and in grasping how
the idea arises. Suppose I wish to define my motion as I travel
along in an automobile. I may be moving at the rate of 25 miles an
hour relative to objects fixed on the roadside, but relative to a
fellow-passenger I am not moving at all; relative to the sun I am
moving with a speed of 18 1/2 miles per second in an elliptical orbit,
and again relative to the stars I am moving in the direction of the
star Vega at a speed of 12 miles per second. Thus motion can only be
defined relative to some object or point of reference. Now this is
not satisfactory to the exact scientist. Scientists are not content
with knowing, for example, that the temperature of boiling water is
+100° C. relative to the temperature of freezing; they have set out
to determine absolute temperatures and have found that water boils at
373° C. above absolute zero. Why should I not, therefore, determine
the absolute motion of the automobile, not its motion relative to
the road, earth, sun or stars, but relative to absolute rest?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account