The air surrounding the Earth is always charged to some extent with
electricity, which in fine weather is usually positive, but changes to
negative on the approach of wet weather. This electricity is always
leaking away to the earth more or less rapidly, and on its way it
passes through the tissues of the vegetation. An exceedingly slow but
constant discharge therefore is probably taking place in the tissues
of all plants. Experiments appear to indicate that the upper part of a
growing plant is negative, and the lower part positive, and at any rate
it is certain that the leaves of a plant give off negative electricity.
In dull weather this discharge is at its minimum, but under the
influence of bright sunshine it goes on with full vigour. It is not
known exactly how this discharge affects the plant, but apparently it
assists its development in some way, and there is no doubt that when
the discharge is at its maximum the flow of sap is most vigorous.
Possibly the electricity helps the plant to assimilate its food, by
making this more readily soluble.
This being so, a plant requires a regular daily supply of uninterrupted
sunshine in order to arrive at its highest possible state of maturity.
In our notoriously variable climate there are many days with only
short intermittent periods of bright sunshine, and many other days
without any sunshine at all. Now if, on these dull days, we can perform
at least a part of the work of the sunshine, and strengthen to some
extent the minute currents passing through the tissues of a plant, the
development of this plant should be accelerated, and this is found
to be the case. Under electrical influence plants not only arrive at
maturity quicker, but also in most cases their yield is larger and of
finer quality.
Lemström used a large influence machine as the source of electricity
in his experiments in electro-culture. Such machines are very suitable
for experimental work on a small scale, and much valuable work has
been done with them by Professor Priestly and others; but they have
the great drawback of being uncertain in working. They are quite
satisfactory so long as the atmosphere remains dry, but in damp weather
they are often very erratic, and may require hours of patient labour to
coax them to start. For this reason an induction coil is more suitable
for continuous work on an extensive scale.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account