Reduce the first and second quantities, if necessary, to quantities of
the same denomination. Thus, in the second question, £20 15_s._ must
be reduced to shillings (219). The third quantity may also be reduced
to any other denomination, if convenient; or the first and third may
be multiplied by any quantity we please, as was done in the second
question; and, on looking at the answer in (238), and at (108), it
will be seen that no change is made by that multiplication. Multiply
the second and third quantities together, and divide by the first. The
result is a quantity of the same sort as the third in the line, and is
the answer required. Thus, to the first question the answer is (238)
208 × 156 17_s._ 4_d_. × 156
----------pence, or, which is the same thing, -------------------.
22 22
240. The whole process in the first question is as follows:[50]
yds. yds. _s._ _d._
22 : 156 ∷ 17 . 4
12
---
208 pence.
156
----
1248
1040
208
-----
22)32448(1474¾_d._ and ¹⁴/₂₂, or ⁷/₁₁ of a farthing,
22 or (219) £6 . 2 . 10¾-⁷/₁₁.
---
104
88
----
164
154
----
108
88
--
20
(228) 4
--
80
66
--
14
[50] It is usual to place points, in the manner here shewn, between the
quantities. Those who have read Section VIII. will see that the Rule
of Three is no more than the process for finding the fourth term of a
proportion from the other three.
The question might have been solved without reducing 17_s._ 4_d._ to
pence, thus:
yds. yds. _s._ _d._
22 : 156 ∷ 17 . 4
156 (227)
----------
22)£135 . 4 . 0(£6 . 2 . 10¾-⁷/₁₁ (228)
132
---
3 × 20 + 4 = 64
44
--
20 × 12 = 240
220
---
20 × 4 = 80
66
--
14
The student must learn by practice which is the most convenient method
for any particular case, as no rule can be given.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account