The number which 10 stands for is called the _radix_ of the _scale of
notation_. To change a number from one scale into another, divide the
number, written as in the first scale, by the number which is to be the
radix of the new scale; repeat this division again and again, and the
remainders are the digits required. For example, what, in the quinary
scale, is that number which, in the decimal scale, is 17036?
5)17036
-----
5)3407 Remʳ. 1
----
5)681 2
---
5)136 1
---
5)27 1
--
5)5 2
-
5)1 0
-
0 1
_Answer_ 1021121
Quinary. Decimal.
_Verification_, 1000000 means 15625
20000 1250
1000 125
100 25
20 10
1 1
------ -----
1021121 17036
The reason of this rule is easy. Our process of division is nothing but
telling off 17036 into 3407 fives and 1 over; we then find 3407 fives
to be 681 fives of fives and 2 _fives_ over. Next we form 681 fives of
fives into 136 fives of fives of fives and 1 five of fives over; and so
on.
It is a useful exercise to multiply and divide numbers represented in
other scales of notation than the common or decimal one. The rules are
in all respects the same for all systems, _the number carried being
always the radix of the system_. Thus, in the quinary system we carry
fives instead of tens. I now give an example of multiplication and
division:
Quinary. Decimal.
42143 means 2798
1234 194
------ -----
324232 11192
232034 25182
134341 2798
42143
--------- ------
114332222 542812
Duodecimal. Decimal.
4_t_9)76_t_4_e_08(16687 705)22610744(32071
4_t_9 1460
----- 5074
2814 1394
2546 689
-----
28_te_
2546
------
3650
3320
-----
3308
2_t_33
------
495
Another way of turning a number from one scale into another is as
follows: Multiply the first digit by the _old_ radix _in the new
scale_, and add the next digit; multiply the result again by the old
radix in the new scale, and take in the next digit, and so on to the
end, always using the radix of the scale you want to leave, and the
notation of the scale you want to end in.
Thus, suppose it required to turn 16687 (duodecimal) into the decimal
scale, and 16432 (septenary) into the quaternary scale:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account