PROP. 1. If a fraction be reduced to its lowest terms, _so called_,[61]
that is, if neither, numerator nor denominator be divisible by any
integer greater than unity, then no fraction of a smaller numerator and
denominator can have the same value.
[61] This theorem shews that what is _called_ reducing a fraction to
its lowest terms (namely, dividing numerator and denominator by their
greatest common measure), is correctly so called.
Let _a_/_b_ be a fraction in which _a_ and _b_ have no common measure
greater than unity: and, if possible, let _c_/_d_ be a fraction of the
same value, _c_ being less than _a_, and _d_ less than _b_. Now, since
_a_ _c_ _a_ _b_
--- = ---, we have --- = ---;
_b_ _d_ _c_ _d_
let _m_ be the integer quotient of these last fractions (which must
exist, since _a_ > _c_, _b_ > _d_), and let _e_ and _f_ be the
remainders. Then
_a_ _mc_ + _e_ _c_ _mc_
--- or ---------- = --- = ----
_b_ _md_ + _f_ _d_ _md_
Hence,
_e_ _mc_
--- and ---- must be equal, for if not,
_f_ _md_
_mc_ + _e_ _mc_ _e_
---------- would lie between ---- and ---,
_md_ + _f_ _md_ _f_
instead of being equal to the former. Hence,
_a_ _e_
--- = ---;
_b_ _f_
so that if a fraction whose numerator and denominator have no common
measure greater than unity, be equal to a fraction of lower numerator
and denominator, it is equal to another in which the numerator and
denominator are still lower. If we proceed with
_a_ _e_
--- = --- in a similar manner, we find
_b_ _f_
_a_ _g_
--- = --- where _g_ < _e_, _h_ < _f_,
_b_ _h_
and so on. Now, if there be any process which perpetually diminishes
the terms of a fraction by one or more units at every step, it must at
last bring either the numerator or denominator, or both, to 0. Let
_a_ _v_
--- = ---
_b_ _w_
be one of the steps, and let _a_ = _kv_ + _x_, _b_ = _kw_ + _y_; so that
_kv_ + _x_ _v_
---------- = ---.
_kw_ + _y_ _w_
Now, if _x_ = 0 but not _y_, this is absurd, for it gives
_kv_ _kv_
---------- = ----.
_kw_ + _y_ _kw_
A similar absurdity follows if _y_ be 0, but not _x_; and if both _x_
and _y_ be = 0, then _a_ = _kv_, _b_ = _kw_, or _a_ and _b_ have a
common measure, _k_. Now _k_ must be greater than 1, for _v_ and _w_
are less than _c_ and _d_, which by hypothesis are less than _a_ and
_b_. Consequently _a_ and _b_ have a common measure _k_ greater than 1,
which by hypothesis they have not. If, then, _a_ and _b_ be integers
not divisible by any integer greater than 1, the fraction _a_/_b_ is
really _in its lowest terms_. Also _a_ and _b_ are said to be _prime to
one another_.
PROP. 2. If the product _ab_ be divisible by _c_, and if _c_ be prime
to _b_, it must divide _a_. Let
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account