V. Multiply the first divisor by the second figure of the root; if the
product be greater than the first dividend, use a lower number for the
second figure of the root, and for the last figure of the divisor,
until the multiplication just mentioned gives the product less than the
first dividend; subtract this from the first dividend, which gives the
second remainder.
VI. Annex the third period to the second remainder, which gives the
second dividend.
VII. Double the first two figures of the root;[25] see how often the
result is contained in the number made by cutting one figure from the
right of the second dividend; use the quotient as the third figure of
the root; annex it to the right of the double of the first two figures,
and call this the second divisor.
[25] Or, more simply, add the second figure of the root to the first
divisor.
VIII. Get a new remainder, as in V., and repeat the process until all
the periods are exhausted; if there be then no remainder, the square
root is found; if there be a remainder, the proposed number has no
square root, and the number found as its square root is the square root
of the proposed number diminished by the remainder.
IX. When it happens that the double of the figures of the root is not
contained at all in all the dividend except the last figure, or when,
being contained once, 1 is found to give more than the dividend, put a
cipher in the square root and in the divisor, and bring down the next
period; should the same thing still happen, put another cipher in the
root and divisor, and bring down another period; and so on.
EXERCISES.
Numbers proposed. | Square roots.
73441 | 271
2992900 | 1730
6414247921 | 80089
903687890625 | 950625
42420747482776576 | 205962976
13422659310152401 | 115856201
164. Since the square of a fraction is obtained by squaring the
numerator and the denominator, the square root of a fraction is found
by taking the square root of both. Thus, the square root of ²⁵/₆₄ is ⅝,
since 5 × 5 is 25, and 8 × 8 is 64. If the numerator or denominator,
or both, be not square numbers, it does not therefore follow that the
fraction has no square root; for it may happen that multiplication
or division by the same number may convert both the numerator and
denominator into square numbers (108). Thus, ²⁷/₄₈, which appears at
first to have no square root, has one in reality, since it is the same
as ⁹/₁₆, whose square root is ¾.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account