206. We now proceed to find how many _permutations_, each containing
one given number, can be made from the counters in another given
number, six, for example. If we knew how to find all the permutations
containing four counters, we might make those which contain five
thus: Take any one which contains four, for example, _abcf_ in which
_d_ and _e_ are omitted; write _d_ and _e_ successively at the end,
which gives _abcfd_, _abcfe_, and repeat the same process with every
other permutation of four; thus, _dabc_ gives _dabce_ and _dabcf_.
No permutation of five can escape us if we proceed in this manner,
provided only we know those of four; for any given permutation of five,
as _dbfea_, will arise in the course of the process from _dbfe_, which,
according to our rule, furnishes _dbfea_. Neither will any permutation
be repeated twice, for _dbfea_, if the rule be followed, can only
arise from the permutation _dbfe_. If we begin in this way to find the
permutations of two out of the six,
_a_ _b_ _c_ _d_ _e_ _f_
each of these gives five; thus,
_a_ gives _ab_ _ac_ _ad_ _ae_ _af_
_b_ ... _ba_ _bc_ _bd_ _be_ _bf_
and the whole number is 6 × 5, or 30.
Again, _ab_ gives _abc_ _abd_ _abe_ _abf_
_ac_ ... _acb_ _acd_ _ace_ _acf_
and here are 30, or 6 × 5 permutations of 2, each of which gives 4
permutations of 3; the whole number of the last is therefore 6 × 5 × 4,
or 120.
Again, _abc_ gives _abcd_ _abce_ _abcf_
_abd_ ... _abdc_ _abde_ _abdf_
and here are 120, or 6 × 5 × 4, permutations of three, each of which
gives 3 permutations of four; the whole number of the last is therefore
6 × 5 × 4 × 3, or 360.
In the same way, the number of permutations of 5 is 6 × 5 × 4 × 3 ×
2, and the number of permutations of six, or the number of different
ways in which the whole six can be arranged, is 6 × 5 × 4 × 3 × 2
× 1. The last two results are the same, which must be; for since a
permutation of five only omits one, it can only furnish one permutation
of six. If instead of six we choose any other number, _x_, the number
of permutations of two will be _x_(_x_-1), that of three will be
_x_(_x_-1)(_x_-2), that of four _x_(_x_ -1)(_x_-2)(_x_-3), the rule
being: Multiply the whole number of counters by the next less number,
and the result by the next less, and so on, until as many numbers
have been multiplied together as there are to be counters in each
permutation: the product will be the whole number of permutations of
the sort required. Thus, out of 12 counters, permutations of four may
be made to the number of 12 × 11 × 10 × 9, or 11880.
EXERCISES.
207. In how many different ways can eight persons be arranged on eight
seats?
_Answer_, 40320.
In how many ways can eight persons be seated at a round table, so that
all shall not have the same neighbours in any two arrangements?[30]
_Answer_, 5040.
[30] The difference between this problem and the last is left to the
ingenuity of the pupil.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account