_Spectator_, Nº 90. Better thus: Virgil, who in the sixth book of his Æneid has cast, _&c._ And Philip the Fourth was obliged at last to conclude a peace, on terms repugnant to his inclination, to that of his people, to the interest of Spain, and to that of all Europe, in the Pyrenean treaty. _Letters on history, vol. 1. letter 6. Bolingbroke._ Better thus: And at last, in the Pyrenean treaty, Philip the Fourth was obliged to conclude a peace, _&c._ In arranging a period, it is of importance to determine in what part of it a word makes the greatest figure, whether in the beginning, during the currency, or at the close. The breaking silence rouses the attention to what is said; and therefore deeper impression is made at the beginning than during the currency. The beginning, however, must yield to the close; which being succeeded by a pause, affords time for a word to make its deepest impression. Hence the following rule, That to give the utmost force to a period, it ought if possible to be closed with that word which makes the greatest figure. The opportunity of a pause should not be thrown away upon accessories, but reserved for the principal object, in order that it may make a full impression. This is an additional reason against closing a period with a circumstance. There are however periods that admit not this structure; and in that case, the capital word ought if possible to be placed in the front, which next to the close is the most advantageous for making an impression. Hence, in directing our discourse to any man, we ought to begin with his name; and one will be sensible of a degradation, when this rule is neglected, as it frequently is for the sake of verse. I give the following examples. Integer vitæ, scelerisque purus, Non eget Mauris jaculi, neque arcu, Nec venenatis gravidâ sagittis, Fusce, pharetrâ. _Horat. Carm. l. 1. ode 22._ Je crains Dieu, cher Abner, et n’ai point d’autre crainte. In these examples the name of the person addressed to makes a mean figure, being like a circumstance slipt into a corner. That this criticism is well founded, we need no other proof than Addison’s translation of the last example. O Abner! I fear my God, and I fear none but him. _Guardian_, Nº 117. O father, what intends thy hand, she cry’d, Against thy only son? What fury, O son, Possesses thee to bend that mortal dart Against thy father’s head? _Paradise Lost, book 2. l. 727._ Every one must be sensible of a dignity in the invocation at the beginning, which that in the middle is far from reaching. I mean not however to censure this expression. On the contrary it appears beautiful, by distinguishing the respect due to a father and to a son. * * * * *