Elements of Morals: With Special Application of the Moral Law to the Duties of the Individual and of Society and the StateJanet, Paul
Philosophy
Elements of Morals: With Special Application of the Moral Law to the Duties of the Individual and of Society and the State
Janet, Paul
Ethics
Without admitting that science is of itself a legitimate object of
research, it will be recognized that it is lawful to study it, either in
our own interest or for the love of others, or for the love of God. But
this is not enough: to see in science nothing but a means to be useful to
ourselves (as, for example, to make a living),[114] is a servile and
mercenary view, which does not deserve to be discussed. To maintain that
science should only be cultivated because of its utility to others, is the
same as to say that man has no duties toward himself, and that he is not
obliged, letting alone the interest of others, to respect or perfect his
own self: a thing we have already refuted. Finally, to say that science
should be cultivated as a gift from God, and for the love of God, may be
true; but this is not any more applicable to that occupation than to any
other; and the same may be said of any other kind of duty without
exception. Certainly, science should not make one proud; but pride is only
an adventitious and not a necessary consequence, which, in speaking of
cultivating science, should not be confounded with the fact itself.
Besides, when Malebranche says that the scientist is not any happier or
wiser for his science, he is mistaken: for the greatest happiness is
sometimes derived from science alone; and as to the wisdom of it, a taste
for elevated thought is already a guarantee against the allurements of the
passions; finally, whilst we cultivate science, we are safe from other
less innocent inclinations.
To the opinions of Nicole and Malebranche, let us oppose the testimony of
two men who possessed in the highest degree the respect and love of
science:
"It is unworthy of man," says Aristotle, "not to possess himself of
all the science he can. If the poets are right, when they say that the
Divinity is capable of jealousy, this jealousy would especially
manifest itself in regard to philosophy, and then, all those who
indulged in elevated thought would be unhappy. But it is not possible
for the Divinity to be jealous, and the poets, as the proverb says, do
not always tell the truth.
Let us now hear Descartes:
"Although in judging myself I find that I am more disposed to incline
toward the side of distrust than presumption, and that regarding with
a philosopher's eye the diverse actions and enterprises of men, there
be scarcely any that do not seem to me vain and useless, yet does the
progress which I think I have already made in the search for truth
give me extreme satisfaction, and inspire me with such hopes for the
future that if, among the more material occupations of men, there are
any substantially good and important, I dare believe that it is the
one I have chosen."[115]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account