Elements of Morals: With Special Application of the Moral Law to the Duties of the Individual and of Society and the StateJanet, Paul
Philosophy
Elements of Morals: With Special Application of the Moral Law to the Duties of the Individual and of Society and the State
Janet, Paul
Ethics
Among these primitive duties, which cost him that fulfills them but
little, the ancients put in the first rank _hospitality_. It is in fact a
virtue of primitive times which exists especially among barbarous and
savage peoples. In the poems of Homer we see to what degree the guest was
held sacred; it is still so among the Arabs and the Indians of America.
This virtue, on the contrary, seems to have disappeared with civilization.
The reason of it is that among barbarous populations, where security is
feeble, it was the point of honor which guaranteed the security of
strangers. But as civilization becomes more complicated, as traveling
increases, and security becomes greater, mercenary hospitality takes the
place of free and private hospitality. Nevertheless, there can always
remain some occasion for this primitive virtue in places isolated and
separated from the great centres: this, for example, can still be seen in
our days in the great wastes of America and Australia.
=67. Benefactions--Duties of the benefactor.=--The foregoing actions,
however praiseworthy they may be, are too simple and too easy to be
presented as real acts of benevolence. This term is reserved for the more
difficult actions, which may cost us some real sacrifices more or less
great, and which, moreover, are important services. These are what are
called benefactions.
Seneca, in his _Treatise on benefactions_, has fixed the principles of
benevolence:
1. Benefaction consists especially in the feeling which accompanies it,
rather than in the thing given.
"What is a benefaction?" he asks; "it is an act of benevolence which
procures joy to him who is the object of it and to him who exercises
it: it is a voluntary and spontaneous act. It is then not at the thing
done and given that we must look, but at the intention, because the
benefaction does not consist in the gift or in the action, but in the
disposition of him who gives. The proof of this difference is that the
benefaction is always a good, whilst the thing done or given is
neither a good nor an evil. The benefaction is then not the money that
is counted out to you, the present that is made you; no more than the
worship of the gods consists in its fattest victims, but in the
uprightness and piety of their worshipers.
"One prefers a hand that opens easily to one that gives largely. He
has done little for me, but he could not do any more. That other has
given much, but he hesitated, he delayed, he groaned in giving, he
gave with ostentation; he proclaimed his good deed; he did not care to
please him whom he obliged: it is not to me he gave, it is to his
vanity." (I., vi.)
2. One should do good without caring about ingrates.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account