This sentence was, had she known it, prophetic, for this very year
was to furnish her with an excellent and loving husband, a position
of importance, and a plentiful fortune. In a letter to Sarah at this
period mention is made by Elizabeth of Lord George Bentinck (the duke’s
uncle) having been ill, and the means taken for his recovery!--
“Lord George is much better than he was, and Drs. Mead and Sandys
have not determined whether it _is_ gout. I hope it is not; he has
been _blooded forty ounces_ within this week, and they say looks as
florid as ever!”
[Page heading: NORTHFLEET FAIR]
Elizabeth now left the duchess, joining her sister, who was in town
with her friend, Mrs. Cotes, and writes to her beloved duchess from
Sittingbourne, their halting-place _en route_ home. In this letter she
says--
“When I arrived at Northfleet, where we dined, every Phillis and
Corydon were at a fair in the town, and to enter into the humours
of the place, I walked through it. In one booth were nymphs and
swains buying garters, with amorous posies, some only with the
humble request, ‘When these you see, remember me’; others with a
poetical and more familiar ‘Be true to me, as I’m to thee.’ Under
another booth, for the pleasure of bold British youths, was Admiral
Vernon in gingerbread; indeed he appeared in many shapes there,
and the curate of the parish carried him home in a brass tobacco
stopper. I was a little concerned to see him lying in passive
gingerbread, upon a stall with Spanish nuts; but the politicians
of our age are wonderful in reconciling the interest of nations.
I assure you there was a great deal of company; many hearts did
I see exchanged for fairings of cherry-coloured ribbon; and one
Cymon more polished than the rest, presented his damsel with a fan,
with the intent, I presume, not to give ‘coolness to the matchless
Dame.’”
Of politics and the opposition to Sir Robert Walpole, we now gain a
glimpse in a letter of Mrs. Donnellan’s of January 14 to Elizabeth--
“It is certainly believed that the King has sent an offer of a
reconciliation, and that tempter gold, to the Prince[199] by the
Bishop of Oxford,[200] whose answer was that while Sir Robert, who
he apprehended had raised his Majesty’s resentment against him, was
at Court, he could not appear there, but that if he was removed, he
would fly without any other conditions but to have the happiness of
throwing himself at his Majesty’s feet.”
[199] Frederick, Prince of Wales, then on very bad terms with his
father.
[200] Thomas Secker, born 1693, died 1768; afterwards Archbishop of
Canterbury.
[Page heading: SIR ROBERT WALPOLE]
The duchess, writing on January 23, says, “Sir Robert carried the
question by three votes.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account