“I thought it would be agreeable to you to have an account of the
mighty and important proceedings of both houses yesterday, so I
have sent you the question, which was debated in both Houses with a
good deal of warmth. It was brought into the House of Lords by Lord
Carteret,[218] who spoke two hours in opening. Lord Carlisle and
Lord Westmorland spoke with great warmth, and Lord Carlisle[219]
was very bitter. Lord Halifax[220] seconded Lord Carteret. Lord
Talbot said in answer to the Duke of Marlborough’s motion (that it
might be voted that an attempt to inflict any kind of punishment,
etc., etc.) that he would not say that all persons were interested
that spoke in favour of Sir Robert, that they appeared to be so,
and upon being called to order, he said with heat that he was used
to speak truth, and he did believe (by the most sacred oath) that
they were so, and that he was ready to give any man satisfaction
that would require it. All moderate men voted with the majority in
both Houses. Lord Cornbury and Mr. Harley spoke in favour of Sir
R.: the latter said that though Sir R. had pursued a relation[221]
of his without evidence, and caused his imprisonment, and thereby
the shortening of his life, he could not, as he had differed from
him in all his measures, copy him in that, and so withdrew with
his brother and many others who had great disobligations to the
Member. Mr. Skipper would not vote against the great man, for it
seems there was no proof nor evidence of the accusations. I think
the majority was 290 against 190 in the House of Commons. Many of
the Country interest did not vote at all; they did not break up
till three. The House of Lords at one o’clock in the morning. Mr.
Sandys[222] opened very well, and Mr. ‘Ste’-Fox[223] spoke on the
other side extremely well. I may by the next post, be able to give
you a further account of the matter, but this is all I have yet
heard, for the Members of Parliament are half asleep to-day.
“I am, Sir,
“Your most dutiful, etc.”
[218] John, 2nd Baron Carteret, afterwards Earl Granville.
[219] 7th Earl of Carlisle.
[220] 5th Earl of Halifax.
[221] Alluding to the impeachment and imprisonment of Robert
Harley, 1st Earl of Oxford.
[222] Afterwards 1st Lord Sandys of Ombersley.
[223] Father of 1st Baron Holland.
[Page heading: THE HOUSE’S ADDRESS]
On the other side of this folio letter, in _another handwriting_, is
_the Question_--
“The House was moved that an humble Address be presented to his
Majesty, most humbly to advise and beseech his Majesty that he
will be most graciously pleased to Remove the Right Honble. Sir
Robert Walpole, Kt. of the most noble order of the Garter, first
Commissioner of his Majesty’s Treasury, and Chancellor of the
Exchequer, and one of his Majesty’s Most Honourable Privy Council,
from his Majesty’s Presence and Councils for ever,
“And a question being stated thereupon after long Debate,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account