Eminent doctors: Their lives and their work; Vol. 2 of 2Bettany, G. T. (George Thomas)
History
Eminent doctors: Their lives and their work; Vol. 2 of 2
Bettany, G. T. (George Thomas)
Medicine -- Great Britain -- History; Physicians -- Great Britain
A later important work is “Body and Will,” 1883. “Its justification
from my standpoint,” says Dr. Maudsley, “is, that I have been engaged
all my life in dealing with mind in its concrete human embodiments,
and that in order to find out why individuals feel, think, and do
differently, and in what way best to deal with them so as to do one’s
duty to oneself and to them, I have had no choice but to leave the
barren heights of speculation for the plains on which men live and
move and have their being. It is not enough to think and talk about
abstract minds and their qualities when you have to do with concrete
minds that must be observed, and studied, and managed.”
This work deals with questions too vast to be summarily discussed;
but one aspect of Dr. Maudsley’s mind is well expounded in the
following extract:—
“In nature, as we see it, we seem to see a conflict of warring
opposites; gravitation opposed, or rather indeed complemented, by
repulsion; chemical affinities by chemical repulsions; magnetic
attraction by electric repulsion; evolution by dissolution;
conservation by revolution, quiet or catastrophic; love by hate;
self-love by love of kind; heaven by hell. Certain it is that hate
and destruction are just as necessary agents as love and production
in nature, which could no more be, or be conceived to be, without
the one than without the other; and to call the one good more than
the other, however necessary from the standpoint of human egoism,
is just as if one were to call gravitation good and repulsion bad,
as gravitation, had it self-consciousness, would no doubt do. In
order to have a theory of cosmogony that shall cover all the facts,
it has always been necessary to supplement a good principle by a
bad principle, a God of love and creation by a God of hate and
destruction. And it must always be so. We may, agreeably to the logic
of our wishes, comfort ourselves in our pilgrimage by entertaining
the hope and belief of the working out of good through evil and of
the permanence of good after the disappearance of evil, just as, if
it were useful and pleasing to us to cherish the illusion, we might
persuade ourselves that repulsion will one day be annihilated and
gravitation endure, or that evolution will continue and dissolution
cease to be; but if we look at the matter in the cold spirit of
strictly rational inquiry we shall always find abundant reason to
believe that the sum of the respective energies of good and evil
remains a constant quantity, the respective distribution only
varying, and that we might as well try to increase the height of the
mountain without increasing the depth of the valley, as to increase
the good in the world by purging it of its so-called evil.”
Dr. Maudsley became a Fellow of the College of Physicians in 1869,
has been President of the Medico-Psychological Association, and
received the LL.D. degree from Edinburgh University in 1884.
FOOTNOTES:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account