Empires and Emperors of Russia, China, Korea, and Japan: Notes and Recollections by Monsignor Count Vay de Vaya and LuskodVay, Péter
History
Empires and Emperors of Russia, China, Korea, and Japan: Notes and Recollections by Monsignor Count Vay de Vaya and Luskod
Vay, Péter
Asia -- Description and travel; Eastern question (Far East)
"'Fair play in fight!' What fertile germs of morality lie in this
primitive sense of savagery and childhood! Is it not the root of
military and civic virtues? We smile (as if we had outgrown it!) at the
boyish desire of the small Britisher, Tom Brown, 'to leave behind him
the name of a fellow who never bullied a little boy or turned his back
on a big one.' And yet, who does not know that this desire is the
cornerstone on which moral structures of mighty dimensions can be
reared? May I not go even so far as to say that the gentlest and most
peace-loving of religions endorses this aspiration? This desire of Tom's
is the basis on which the greatness of England is largely built, and it
will not take us long to discover that Bushido does not stand on a lower
pedestal. If fighting in itself, be it offensive or defensive, is, as
Quakers rightly testify, brutal and wrong, we can still say with
Lessing, 'We know from what failings our virtue springs.' Sneaks and
cowards are epithets of the worst opprobrium to healthy, simple natures.
Childhood begins life with those notions, as does also knighthood; but
as life grows larger and its relations become many-sided, the early
faith seeks sanction from higher authority and more rational sources for
its own justification, satisfaction, and development. If military
systems had operated alone, without higher moral support, how far short
of chivalry would the moral ideal have fallen! In Europe Christianity,
interpreted with concessions convenient to chivalry, infused it
nevertheless with a spiritual ideal. 'Religion, war, and glory were the
three rules of a perfect Christian knight,' says Lamartine."
Bushido has no written laws; it has been handed down as a tradition from
father to son. Its originator was not a sage like Confucius, not an
ascetic like Buddha; it was the people itself. It is the immediate
expression of past ages, and, as far as man's memory reaches, the
interpreter of the sentiments of victorious warriors.
With the increasing power of the Samurais grew also the necessity, as
was the case with knighthood, to purify the atmosphere of their
fortresses by self-prescribed rules. And it lies in the natural order of
things, embracing all national codes, that those points should be most
carefully guarded on which the people felt themselves to be weakest.
The first principle, then, was, Justice to all. The Samurais despise
above all things trickery and deceit, all unfairness. "Adhere inflexibly
to thy principle,"--thus writes a Bushi--"and be ready to die for the
sake of duty; but also be ready to strike and to kill if honour demand
it of thee." And the more the general situation became degenerated, the
more prominent became the letter of this law in the clash of swords.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account