If the number of positive ions per unit volume is m and v is the
velocity, we have nue+mve = i, where i is the current through unit
area of the gas. Since nue = i0[epsilon]^nx and i = i0[epsilon]^nl,
when l is the distance between the plates, we see that
nu / mv = [epsilon]^(nx) / ([epsilon]^(nl) - [epsilon]^(nx)),
n v [epsilon]^(nx)
-- = -- · -------------------------------.
m u [epsilon]^(ne) - [epsilon]^(nx)
Since v/u is a very small quantity we see that n will be less than m
except when [epsilon]^nl - [epsilon]^nx is small, i.e. except close to
the anode. Thus there will be an excess of positive electricity from
the cathode almost up to the anode, while close to the anode there
will be an excess of negative. This distribution of electricity will
make the electric force diminish from the cathode to the place where
there is as much positive as negative electricity, where it will have
its minimum value, and then increase up to the anode.
The expression i = i0[epsilon]^[alpha]l applies to the case when there
is no source of ionization in the gas other than the collisions; if in
addition to this there is a source of uniform ionization producing q
ions per cubic centimetre, we can easily show that
qe
i = i0[epsilon]^{[alpha]l} + -------(e^{[alpha]l} - 1).
[alpha]
With regard to the minimum energy which must be possessed by a
corpuscle to enable it to produce ions by collision, Townsend (loc.
cit.) came to the conclusion that to ionize air the corpuscle must
possess an amount of energy equal to that acquired by the fall of its
charge through a potential difference of about 2 volts. This is also
the value arrived at by H. A. Wilson by entirely different
considerations. Stark, however, gives 17 volts as the minimum for
ionization. The energy depends upon the nature of the gas; recent
experiments by Dawes and Gill and Pedduck (_Phil. Mag._, Aug. 1908)
have shown that it is smaller for helium than for air, hydrogen, or
carbonic acid gas.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account