ART. 42.--Goods which belong to the owner of the contraband and are on board the same vessel are liable to condemnation. ART. 43.--If a vessel is encountered at sea while unaware of the outbreak of hostilities or of the declaration of contraband which applies to her cargo, the contraband cannot be condemned except on payment of compensation; the vessel herself and the remainder of the cargo are not liable to condemnation or to the costs and expenses referred to in Article 41. The same rule applies if the master, after becoming aware of the outbreak of hostilities, or of the declaration of contraband, has had no opportunity of discharging the contraband. A vessel is deemed to be aware of the existence of a state of war, or of a declaration of contraband, if she left a neutral port subsequently to the notification to the power to which such port belongs of the outbreak of hostilities or of the declaration of contraband respectively, provided that such notification was made in sufficient time. A vessel is also deemed to be aware of the existence of a state of war if she left an enemy port after the outbreak of hostilities. ART. 44.--A vessel which has been stopped on the ground that she is carrying contraband, and which is not liable to condemnation on account of the proportion of contraband on board, may, when the circumstances permit, be allowed to continue her voyage if the master is willing to hand over the contraband to the belligerent warship. The delivery of the contraband must be entered by the captor on the log-book of the vessel stopped, and the master must give the captor duly certified copies of all relevant papers. The captor is at liberty to destroy the contraband that has been handed over to him under these conditions. See Hautefeuille, _Des droits et devoirs des nations neutres_ (2nd ed., 1858); Perels, _Droit maritime international_, traduit par Arendt (Paris, 1884); Moore, _Digest of International Law_ (1906); L. Oppenheim, _International Law_ (1907); Barclay, _Problems of International Practice and Diplomacy_ (1907). See also Hall, _International Law on Analogues of Contraband_; Smith and Sibley, _International Law as interpreted during the Russo-Japanese War, 1905_, on "Malacca" and "Prinz Heinrich" cases (mails). (T. BA.) FOOTNOTE: [1] See Springbok case, 1866, 5 Wallace I.; on _Doelwijk_ case see Brusa, _Rev. gen. de droit international public_ (1897); Fauchille _id._ (1897), p. 291, also _The Times_, April 15, May 25, June 1, 1897.