5. The bulk of the artillery of the defence should be outside the
forts; the direct-fire guns preferably in cupolas, the howitzers in
concealed positions.
6. The forts should be connected by lines of entrenched infantry
positions and obstacles, permanent bomb-proof shelters being provided
for the infantry.
7. There should be ample communications--radial and
peripheral--between the place and the forts, both by road and rail.
8. Special lines of communication--such as mountain passes--should be
closed by barrier forts.
These considerations will now be taken somewhat more in detail, but
first it will be useful to deal with the plan of Metz in 1899 (fig. 44).
Metz.
Here the fortifications of successive periods can be readily
recognized. First the old enceinte, unaltered by the Germans and now
_declassee_. Next the detached forts, begun by the French engineers in
1868 and still unfinished in 1870, can be readily recognized by their
bastioned trace. Among them are Fort Manteuffel, formerly St Julien,
and Fort Goeben (fig. 45), formerly Queuleu. These were not altered in
their general lines.
[Illustration: From Plessix and Legrand's _Manuel complet de la
fortification_, by permission.
FIG. 45.--Fort Goeben, Metz.]
This early line of detached forts, less than 3000 yds. from the
enceinte, was completed by the Germans with forts of polygonal type
such as Fort Prinz August. The hill of St Quentin (fig. 46), a very
important point, was converted into a fortified position, with two
forts and connecting parapets, and a communication running north to
Fort Alvensleben.
The arrangement of wing batteries in connexion with the forts can be
clearly noted at Fort Manteuffel. These are reinforced by other
batteries either for the defence of the intervals or to dominate
important lines of approach such as the valley of the Moselle (canal
battery at Montigny). To these were added later armoured batteries.
There are also infantry positions, shelters and magazines in connexion
with this line.
Finally some new forts of modern type were commenced in 1899 at about
9000 yds. from the place.
Fortresses.
Leaving out of consideration at present the strategic use of groups of
fortresses, the places which, as mentioned above, are intrinsically
worth being defended as fortresses are:--
(a) Centres of national, industrial or military resources.
(b) Places which may serve as _points d'appui_ for manoeuvres.
(c) Points of intersection of important railroads.
(d) Bridges over considerable rivers.
(e) Certain lines of communication across a frontier.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account