In actual practice enceintes have been constructed since 1870 in
France and other countries, consisting of a simple wall 10 or 12 ft.
high with a banquette and loopholes at intervals. This of course can
only be looked upon as a measure of police. For war purposes, in face
of modern artillery, it is a _reductio ad absurdum_.
_The Safety Armament._--If the bulk of the artillery is to be placed
in positions prepared on the outbreak of war, it is considered very
necessary that a few heavy long-range guns should be permanently in
position ready at any moment to keep an enemy at a distance, forcing
him to open his first batteries at long range and checking the advance
of his investment line. Such guns would naturally be in secure
positions inside the forts, and if they are to be worked from such
positions they must have armour to shield them from the concentrated
fire of the numerous field artillery that a besieger could bring to
bear from the first.
The question of artillery positions.
Artillery outside the forts constitutes the most important part of the
defence, and there is room for much discussion as to whether it should
have positions prepared for it beforehand or should be placed in
positions selected as the attack develops itself. On the one hand the
preparation of the positions beforehand, which in many cases means the
use of armour and concrete, increases very largely the initial expense
of the defence, and ties the defender somewhat in the special
dispositions that become desirable once the attack has taken shape.
Moreover, such expenditure must be incurred on all the fronts of the
fortress, whereas the results would only be realized on the front or
fronts actually attacked. On the other hand much time and labour are
involved in emplacing heavy and medium artillery with extemporized
protection, and this becomes a serious consideration when one remembers
how much work of all kinds is necessary in preparing a fortress against
attack. Again, to avoid the danger of a successful attack on the
intervals between the forts before their defences have been fully
completed, the fire of the guns in the intermediate positions might be
urgently required. The solution in any given case would no doubt depend
on the importance of the place. In most cases a certain amount of
compromise will come in, some preparation being made for batteries,
without their being completed. Armoured batteries of whatever kind must
in any case be prepared in peace time. It should not be overlooked that
as, whatever theories may exist about successive lines of defence, the
onus of the defence will now lie on the fort line, just as it formerly
did on the enceintes, so that line should be fully prepared, and should
not have to commence its fight in a position of inequality.
[Illustration: From Brialmont's _Progres de la defense des etats et de
la fortification permanente depuis Vauban_, by permission of M. le
Commandant G. Meeus.
FIG. 47.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account