But if the defenders are active, they will countermine. There is as a
general rule this broad difference between the mines of the defence and
those of the attack, that the defenders do not wish the surface of the
ground broken, lest increased opportunities of getting cover should be
offered to the besiegers. The object of the defence, therefore, is to
destroy the besiegers' galleries without forming craters, and for this
purpose they generally endeavour to get underneath the attack galleries.
The defenders may, however, wish, if the opportunity is allowed them, to
explode mines under the attack parallels, in which case there is of
course no objection to disturbing the surface.
"At the commencement of the subterranean war the main object of the
defence is to force the besieger to take to mining operations as early
as possible, as it is a tedious operation and will prolong the siege.
Every endeavour must be made to push forward countermines so as to
meet and check the attack. On the approach of the opponents to each
other careful listening for the enemy must be resorted to. To this end
it is necessary at _irregular_ intervals to suspend all work for some
minutes at a time, closing doors of communication and employing
experienced listeners at the heads of the countermines. This matter is
a most important one, as a premature explosion of the defender's mines
is a double loss to the defender, a loss of a mine and an advantage to
the enemy in more than one way. As soon as the overcharged mines of
the besieger have been fired, a heavy fire should be brought to bear
on the craters, and if possible sorties should be made to prevent the
enemy occupying them. At the same time every effort should be made
underground to surround with galleries, and as it were isolate, the
craters so as to prevent the besieger making a new advance from them.
The efforts of the attack at this stage will probably be directed to
the formation of what are called "Boule shafts" (i.e. shafts partially
lined in which charges are hastily fired with little or no tamping),
and to meet these in time the defender may resort to the use of boring
tools, and so place charges somewhere in advance of the heads of the
countermines. His great object must be to prevent as long as possible
the besieger from getting underground again; and these occasions, when
the power of resistance is temporarily equal to, if not greater than,
that of the attack, should be made the most of by the defence."
(Lewis, _Text-book on Fortification, &c._, 1893.)
The defence has the advantage, in the case of fortresses, of being able
to establish beforehand a system of countermine galleries in masonry.
Many systems have been worked out for this purpose. A good typical
arrangement is that of General Marescot, published in 1799, shown in
fig. 72.
[Illustration: From _Textbook of Fortification_, by permission of the
Controller H.M. Stationery Office.
FIG. 72.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account