Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "France" to "Francis Joseph I.": Volume 10, Slice 8Various
History
Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "France" to "Francis Joseph I.": Volume 10, Slice 8
Various
Encyclopedias and dictionaries
Two statements made by Vasari regarding "Piero della Francesca" are
open to much controversy. He says that Piero became blind at the age
of sixty, which cannot be true, as he continued painting some years
later; but scepticism need perhaps hardly go to the extent of
inferring that he was never blind at all. Vasari also says that Fra
Luca Pacioli, a disciple of Piero in scientific matters, defrauded his
memory by appropriating his researches without acknowledgment. This is
hard upon the friar, who constantly shows a great reverence for his
master in the sciences. One of Pacioli's books was published in 1509,
and speaks of Piero as still living. Hence it has been propounded that
Piero lived to the patriarchal age of ninety-four or upwards; but, as
it is now stated that he was buried in 1492, we must infer that there
is some mistake in relation to Pacioli's remark--perhaps the date of
writing was several years earlier than that of publication. Piero was
known to have left a manuscript of his own on perspective; this
remained undiscovered for a long time, but eventually was found by E.
Harzen in the Ambrosian library of Milan, ascribed to some
supposititious "Pietro, Pittore di Bruges." The treatise shows a
knowledge of perspective as dependent on the point of distance.
In the National Gallery, London, are three paintings attributed to
Piero de' Franceschi. Another work, a profile of Isotta da Rimini, may
safely be rejected. The "Baptism of Christ," which used to be the
altar-piece of the Priory of the Baptist in Borgo San Sepolcro, is an
important example; and still more so the "Nativity," with the Virgin
kneeling, and five angels singing to musical instruments. This is a
very interesting and characteristic specimen, and has indeed been
praised somewhat beyond its deservings on aesthetic grounds.
Piero's earlier style was energetic but unrefined, and to the last he
lacked selectness of form and feature. The types of his visages are
peculiar, and the costumes (as especially in the Arezzo series)
singular. He used to work assiduously from clay models swathed in real
drapery. Luca Signorelli was his pupil, and probably to some extent
Perugino; and his own influence, furthered by that of Signorelli, was
potent over all Italy. Belonging as he does to the Umbrian school, he
united with that style something of the Sienese and more of the
Florentine mode.
Besides Vasari and Crowe & Cavalcaselle, the work by W.G. Waters,
_Piero della Francesca_ (1899) should be consulted. (W. M. R.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account