The population which can be permanently supported by a given area of
land differs greatly according to the nature of the resources and the
requirements of the people. Pastoral communities are always scattered
very thinly over large areas; agricultural populations may be almost
equally sparse where advanced methods of agriculture and labour-saving
machinery are employed; but where a frugal people are situated on a
fertile and inexhaustible soil, such as the deltas and river plains of
Egypt, India and China, an enormous population may be supported on a
small area. In most cases, however, a very dense population can only
be maintained in regions where mineral resources have fixed the site
of great manufacturing industries. The maximum density of population
which a given region can support is very difficult to determine; it
depends partly on the race and standard of culture of the people,
partly on the nature and origin of the resources on which they depend,
partly on the artificial burdens imposed and very largely on the
climate. Density of population is measured by the average number of
people residing on a unit of area; but in order to compare one part of
the world with another the average should, strictly speaking, be taken
for regions of equal size or of equal population; and the portions of
the country which are permanently uninhabitable ought to be excluded
from the calculation.[50] Considering the average density of
population within the political limits of countries, the following
list is of some value; the figures for a few smaller divisions of
large countries are added (in brackets) for comparison:
_Average Population on 1 sq. m._ (_For 1900 or 1901._)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account