Wales were soon detected by native geologists, particularly by W.
Buckland, Lyell, J.D. Forbes and Charles Maclaren. Robert Chambers
(1802-1871) did good service in gathering additional evidence from
Scotland and Norway in favour of Agassiz's views, which steadily
gained adherents until, after some quarter of a century, they were
adopted by the great majority of geologists in Britain, and
subsequently in other countries. Since that time the literature of
geology has been swollen by a vast number of contributions in which
the history of the Glacial period, and its records both in the Old and
New World, have been fully discussed.
_Rise and Progress of Palaeontological Geology._--As this branch of
the science deals with the evidence furnished by fossil organic
remains as to former geographical conditions, it early attracted
observers who, in the superficial beds of marine shells found at some
distance from the coast, saw proofs of the former submergence of the
land under the sea. But the occurrence of fossils embedded in the
heart of the solid rocks of the mountains offered much greater
difficulties of explanation, and further progress was consequently
slow. Especially baneful was the belief that these objects were mere
sports of nature, and had no connexion with any once living organisms.
So long as the true organic origin of the fossil plants and animals
contained in the rocks was in dispute, it was hardly possible that
much advance could be made in their systematic study, or in the
geological deductions to be drawn from them. One good result of the
controversy, however, was to be seen in the large collections of these
"formed stones" that were gathered together in the cabinets and
museums of the 17th and 18th centuries. The accumulation and
comparison of these objects naturally led to the production of
treatises in which they were described and not unfrequently
illustrated by good engravings. Switzerland was more particularly
noted for the number and merit of its works of this kind, such as
that of K.N. Lang (_Historia lapidum figuratorum Helvetiae_, 1708) and
those of Johann Jacob Scheuchzer (1672-1733). In England, also,
illustrated treatises were published both by men who looked on fossils
as mere freaks of nature, and by those who regarded them as proofs of
Noah's flood. Of the former type were the works of Martin Lister
(1638-1712) and Robert Plot (_Natural History of Oxfordshire_, 1677).
The Celtic scholar Edward Llwyd (1660-1709) wrote a Latin treatise
containing good plates of a thousand fossils in the Ashmolean Museum,
Oxford, and J. Woodward, in 1728-1729, published his _Natural History
of the Fossils of England_, already mentioned, wherein he described
his own extensive collection, which he bequeathed to the University of
Cambridge, where it is still carefully preserved. The most voluminous
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account