In estimating the influence of recent writers on geography it is usual
to assign to Oscar Peschel (1826-1875) the credit of having corrected
the preponderance which Ritter gave to the historical element, and of
restoring physical geography to its old pre-eminence.[10] As a matter
of fact, each of the leading modern exponents of theoretical
geography--such as Ferdinand von Richthofen, Hermann Wagner, Friedrich
Ratzel, William M. Davis, A. Penck, A. de Lapparent and Elisee
Reclus--has his individual point of view, one devoting more attention
to the results of geological processes, another to anthropological
conditions, and the rest viewing the subject in various blendings of
the extreme lights.
The two conceptions which may now be said to animate the theory of
geography are the genetic, which depends upon processes of origin, and
the morphological, which depends on facts of form and distribution.
PROGRESS OF GEOGRAPHICAL DISCOVERY
Exploration and geographical discovery must have started from more
than one centre, and to deal justly with the matter one ought to treat
of these separately in the early ages before the whole civilized world
was bound together by the bonds of modern intercommunication. At the
least there should be some consideration of four separate systems of
discovery--the Eastern, in which Chinese and Japanese explorers
acquired knowledge of the geography of Asia, and felt their way
towards Europe and America; the Western, in which the dominant races
of the Mexican and South American plateaus extended their knowledge of
the American continent before Columbus; the Polynesian, in which the
conquering races of the Pacific Islands found their way from group to
group; and the Mediterranean. For some of these we have no certain
information, and regarding others the tales narrated in the early
records are so hard to reconcile with present knowledge that they are
better fitted to be the battle-ground of scholars championing rival
theories than the basis of definite history. So it has come about that
the only practicable history of geographical exploration starts from
the Mediterranean centre, the first home of that civilization which
has come to be known as European, though its field of activity has
long since overspread the habitable land of both temperate zones,
eastern Asia alone in part excepted.
From all centres the leading motives of exploration were probably the
same--commercial intercourse, warlike operations, whether resulting in
conquest or in flight, religious zeal expressed in pilgrimages or
missionary journeys, or, from the other side, the avoidance of
persecution, and, more particularly in later years, the advancement of
knowledge for its own sake. At different times one or the other motive
predominated.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account