[13] "The _Vit. auct._ refers to 1676, a 'Letter to William duke of
Newcastle on the Controversy about Liberty and Necessity, held with
Benjamin Laney, bishop of Ely.' In that year there did appear a
(confused) little tract written by Laney against Hobbes's concluding
statement of his own 'Opinion' in the 'Liberty and Necessity' of 1654
(1646), but I can find no trace of any further writing by Hobbes on
the subject" (G. Croom Robertson, _Hobbes_, p. 202).
[14] This translation, _Concerning Body_, though not made by Hobbes,
was revised by him; but it is far from accurate, and not seldom, at
critical places (e.g. c. vi. S 2), quite misleading. Philosophical
citations from the _De corpore_ should always be made in the original
Latin. Molesworth reprints the Latin, not from the first edition of
1655, but from the modified edition of 1668--modified, in the
mathematical chapters, in general (not exact) keeping with the
English edition of 1656. The Vindex episode, referred to in the _Six
Lessons_, becomes intelligible only by going beyond Molesworth to the
original Latin edition of 1655.
[15] They were composed originally, in a somewhat different and
rather more extended form, as the second part of an English treatise
on Optics, completed by the year 1646. Of this treatise, preserved in
Harleian MSS. 3360, Molesworth otherwise prints the dedication to the
marquis of Newcastle, and the concluding paragraphs (_E.W._ vii.
467-471).
[16] _L.W._ iv. 1-232. The propositions on the circle, forty-six in
number (shattered by Wallis in 1662), were omitted by Hobbes when he
republished the _Dialogues_ in 1668, in the collected edition of his
Latin works from which Molesworth reprints. In the part omitted, at
p. 154 of the original edition, Hobbes refers to his first
introduction to Euclid, in a way that confirms the story in Aubrey
quoted in an earlier paragraph.
[17] Remaining at Oxford, Wallis, in fact, took no active part in the
constitution of the new society, but he had been, from 1645, one of
the originators of an earlier association in London, thus continued
or revived. This earlier society had been continued also at Oxford
after the year 1649, when Wallis and others of its members received
appointments there.
[18] The _Problemata physica_ was at the same time put into English
(with some changes and omission of part of the mathematical
appendix), and presented to the king, to whom the work was dedicated
in a remarkable letter apologizing for _Leviathan_. In its English
form, as _Seven Philosophical Problems and Two Propositions of
Geometry_ (_E.W._ vii. 1-68), the work was first published in 1682,
after Hobbes's death.
[19] Wallis's pieces were excluded from the collected edition of his
works (1693-1697), and have become extremely rare.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account