The greatest density of the liquid for which the instrument described
above can be employed is W/V, while the least density is W/(V + nlA),
or W/(V + v), where v represents the volume of the stem between the
extreme divisions of the scale. Now, by increasing v, leaving W and V
unchanged, we may increase the range of the instrument indefinitely.
But it is clear that if we increase A, the sectional area of the stem,
we shall diminish l, the length of a scale-division corresponding to a
given variation of density, and thereby proportionately diminish the
sensibility of the instrument, while diminishing the section A will
increase l and proportionately increase the sensibility, but will
diminish the range over which the instrument can be employed, unless
we increase the length of the stem in the inverse ratio of the
sectional area. Hence, to obtain great sensibility along with a
considerable range, we require very long slender stems, and to these
two objections apply in addition to the question of portability; for,
in the first place, an instrument with a very long stem requires a
very deep vessel of liquid for its complete immersion, and, in the
second place, when most of the stem is above the plane of flotation,
the stability of the instrument when floating will be diminished or
destroyed. The various devices which have been adopted to overcome
this difficulty will be described in the account given of the several
hydrometers which have been hitherto generally employed.
The plan commonly adopted to obviate the necessity of inconveniently
long stems is to construct a number of hydrometers as nearly alike as
may be, but to load them differently, so that the scale-divisions at
the bottom of the stem of one hydrometer just overlap those at the top
of the stem of the preceding. By this means a set of six hydrometers,
each having a stem rather more than 5 in. long, will be equivalent to
a single hydrometer with a stem of 30 in. But, instead of employing a
number of instruments differing only in the weights with which they
are loaded, we may employ the same instrument, and alter its weight
either by adding mercury or shot to the interior (if it can be opened)
or by attaching weights to the exterior. These two operations are not
quite equivalent, since a weight added to the interior does not affect
the volume of liquid displaced when the instrument is immersed up to a
given division of the scale, while the addition of weights to the
exterior increases the displacement. This difficulty may be met, as in
Keene's hydrometer, by having all the weights of precisely the same
volume but of different masses, and never using the instrument except
with one of these weights attached.
[Illustration: FIG. 2.--Clarke's Hydrometer.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account