The chief result of the Indian Mutiny was to end the government of India
by the East India company. It was felt that a system of administration
which could permit such a catastrophe was no longer desirable. On the
2nd of August 1858 the queen signed the act which transferred the
government of India to the crown. On the 1st of November Lord Canning,
now viceroy of India, published the noble proclamation in which the
change was announced, and a full amnesty was offered to all the rebels
who had not been leaders in the revolt or were not guilty of the murder
of British subjects. Even before the fall of Delhi, Canning had been
adversely criticized--"Clemency Canning" he was scornfully called--for
announcing his intention to discriminate between the guilt of various
classes of mutineers. But a wiser view soon prevailed, and the natives
of India at large gratefully accepted the queen's proclamation as the
charter of their lives and liberties.
See G. W. Forrest, _History of the Indian Mutiny_ (1904), and
_Selections from State Papers_ (1897); T. R. E. Holmes, _History of
the Indian Mutiny_ (1898); _Kaye and Malleson's History of the Indian
Mutiny_ (1864-1888); R. S. Rait, _Life of Lord Gough_ (1903); Sir W.
Lee-Warner, _Life of Lord Dalhousie_ (1904); Sir H. Cunningham, _Lord
Canning_ ("Rulers of India" series), (1890); Sir Owen Tudor Burne,
_Clyde and Strathnairn_ (1895); Lord Roberts, _Forty-One Years in
India_ (1898); and Sir Evelyn Wood's articles in _The Times_ in the
autumn of 1907.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account