Chapter xxiv. presupposes the complete subjection of the Canaanites
and is of a late prophetic stamp. Some signs of amplification (e.g.
vv. 11b, 13, 31) suggest that it was inserted by a Deuteronomic hand,
evidently distinct from the author of xxiii. But elsewhere there are
traces of secondary Deuteronomic expansion and of internal
incongruities in Deuteronomic narratives; contrast xiv. 6-15 with
Joshua's extermination of the "Anakim" in xi. 21 seq.; the use of this
name with the "Philistines" of xiii. 2 (see PHILISTINES), or the
conquests in xi. 16-22 with the names in x. 36-43. All these passages
are now due to D; but not only is Deuteronomy itself composite, a
twofold redaction can be traced in Judges, Samuel and Kings, thus
involving the deeper literary problems of Joshua with the historical
books generally.[3] Both Joshua xxiii. and xxiv. are closely connected
with the very complicated introduction to the era of the "judges" in
Judges ii. 6 sqq., and ii. 6-9 actually resume Joshua xxiv. 28 sqq.,
while the Septuagint appends to the close of Joshua the beginning of
the story of Ehud (Judges iii. 12 seq.). Both Judges i.-ii. 5 and
chap. xvii.-xxi. are of post-Deuteronomic insertion, and they
represent conditions analogous to the older notices imbedded in the
later work of P (Judges i. 21, xix. 10-12, cf. Joshua xv. 63; see
JUDGES _ad fin._). Moreover, P in its turn shows elsewhere definite
indications of different periods and standpoints, and the fluid state
of the book at a late age is shown by the presence of Deuteronomic
elements in Joshua xx., not found in the Septuagint, and by the
numerous and often striking readings which the latter recension
presents.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account