The district of Kangra extends from the Jullundur Doab far into the
southern ranges of the Himalaya. Besides some Rajput states, annexed
after the Sikh wars, it includes Lahul, Spiti and Kulu, which are
essentially Tibetan. The Beas is the only important river. Area, 9978
sq. m., of which Kangra proper has only 2725. Pop. (1901), 768,124;
average density 77 persons per sq. m., but with only one person per sq.
m. in Spiti. Tea cultivation was introduced into Kangra about 1850. The
Palampur fair, established by government with a view to fostering
commerce with central Asia, attracts a small concourse of Yarkandi
merchants. The Lahulis carry on an enterprising trade with Ladakh and
countries beyond the frontier, by means of pack sheep and goats. Rice,
tea, potatoes, opium, spices, wool and honey are the chief exports.
See _Kangra District Gazetteer_ (Lahore, 1906).
KANISHKA, king of Kabul, Kashmir, and north-western India in the 2nd
century A.D., was a Tatar of the Kushan tribe, one of the five into
which the Yue-chi Tatars were divided. His dominions extended as far
down into India as Madura, and probably as far to the north-west as
Bokhara. Private inscriptions found in the Punjab and Sind, in the
Yusufzai district and at Madura, and referred by European scholars to
his reign, are dated in the years five to twenty-eight of an unknown
era. It is the references by Chinese historians to the Yue-chi tribes
before their incursion into India, together with conclusions drawn from
the history of art and literature in his reign, that render the date
given the most probable. Kanishka's predecessors on the throne were
Pagans; but shortly after his accession he professed himself, probably
from political reasons, a Buddhist. He spent vast sums in the
construction of Buddhist monuments; and under his auspices the fourth
Buddhist council, the council of Jalandhara (Jullunder) was convened
under the presidency of Vasumitra. At this council three treatises,
commentaries on the Canon, one on each of the three baskets into which
it is divided, were composed. King Kanishka had these treatises, when
completed and revised by Asvaghosha, written out on copper plates, and
enclosed the latter in stone boxes, which he placed in a memorial mound.
For some centuries afterwards these works survived in India; but they
exist now only in Chinese translations or adaptations. We are not told
in what language they were written. It was probably Sanskrit (not Pali,
the language of the Canon)--just as in Europe we have works of
exegetical commentary composed, in Latin, on the basis of the Testament
and Septuagint in Greek. This change of the language used as a medium of
literary intercourse was partly the cause, partly the effect, of a
complete revulsion in the intellectual life of India. The reign of
Kanishka was certainly the turning-point in this remarkable change. It
has been suggested with great plausibility, that the wide extent of his
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account