He refused to Smith's system the title of the industrial, which he
thought more appropriate to the mercantile system, and designated the
former as "the exchange-value system." He denied the parallelism
asserted by Smith between the economic conduct proper to an individual
and to a nation, and held that the immediate private interest of the
separate members of the community would not lead to the highest good
of the whole. That the nation was an existence, standing between the
individual and humanity, and formed into a unity by its language,
manners, historical development, culture and constitution. That this
unity must be the first condition of the security, wellbeing, progress
and civilization of the individual; and private economic interests,
like all others, must be subordinated to the maintenance, completion
and strengthening of the nationality. The nation having a continuous
life, its true wealth must consist--and this is List's fundamental
doctrine--not in the quantity of exchange-values which it possesses,
but in the full and many-sided development of its productive powers.
Its economic education should be more important than the immediate
production of values, and it might be right that one generation should
sacrifice its gain and enjoyment to secure the strength and skill of
the future. In the sound and normal condition of a nation which has
attained economic maturity, the three productive powers of
agriculture, manufactures and commerce should be alike developed. But
the two latter factors are superior in importance, as exercising a
more effective and fruitful influence on the whole culture of the
nation, as well as on its independence. Navigation, railways, all
higher technical arts, connect themselves specially with these
factors; whilst in a purely agricultural state there is a tendency to
stagnation. But for the growth of the higher forms of industry all
countries are not adapted--only those of the temperate zones, whilst
the torrid regions have a natural monopoly in the production of
certain raw materials; and thus between these two groups of countries
a division of labour and confederation of powers spontaneously takes
place.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account