authority power to fix the number of licences and put them up to
auction or to hand over the retail traffic altogether to a company
formed for the purpose of carrying it on. The latter idea, which is
the Gothenburg system, was taken from the example of Falun and
Jönköping which had a few years ago voluntarily adopted the plan. The
law of 1855 further gave rural districts the power of local veto.
Four-fifths of the population live in rural districts, and the great
majority of them immediately took advantage of the provision. The
company system, on the other hand, was not applied by the towns until
1865, when Gothenburg adopted it.
In Norway the course of events was very similar. There, too,
distilling and spirit-drinking were practically universal in the early
part of the century under the laws of 1816, but were checked by
legislation a few years sooner than in Sweden. In 1845 a special
licensing system was introduced, giving the local authority power to
fix the number of licences, and in 1848 the small and domestic stills
were stopped. The Gothenburg system was not adopted in Norway until
1871 and then with some modification. The essence of this method of
conducting the retail traffic is that the element of private gain is
eliminated. A monopoly is granted to a company consisting of a number
of disinterested citizens of standing with a capital, and they manage
the sale both for "on" and "off" consumption in the public interest.
The profits, after payment of 5% on the capital, originally went in
Sweden mainly to the municipality in relief of rates, in Norway to
objects of public utility. The latter was considered preferable
because it offers less temptation to make the profits as high as
possible. Fault has, however, been found with both methods, and
payment of profits to the state is now preferred. In 1894 a law was
passed in Norway providing for the following distribution: 65% to the
state, 20% to the company, and 15% to the municipality. In 1907 Sweden
adopted a law in the same direction. The intention is to eliminate
more completely the motive of gain from the traffic. In 1898 the net
profits of the companies exceeded half a million sterling in Sweden
and reached £117,500 in Norway.
The company system had in 1910 had more than half a century's trial;
it had gone through some vicissitudes and been subjected to much
criticism, which was balanced by at least as much eulogy. It had held
its own in Sweden, where 101 towns had adopted it in 1906. In Norway
at the same date it was in force in 32 towns while 29 had adopted
local veto, which was extended from the country districts, where it
had previously been optional, to the towns by the law of 1894.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account