It was only gradually that the Sceptic's art of fence was developed.
From the time of Pyrrho overlapping Aristotle himself, who seems to
have been well content to use the feints of more than one school among
his predecessors, while showing that none of them could claim to get
past his guard, down through a period in which the decadent academy
under Carneades, otherwise dogmatic in its negations, supplied new
thrusts and parries, to Aenesidemus in the late Ciceronian age, and
again to Sextus Empiricus, there seems to have been something of
plasticity and continuous progress. In this matter the dogmatic
schools offer a marked contrast. In especial it is an outstanding
characteristic of the younger rivals to Aristotelianism that as they
sprang up suddenly into being to contest the claims of the
Aristotelian system in the moment of its triumph, so they reached
maturity very suddenly, and thereafter persisted for the most part in
a stereotyped tradition, modified only when convicted of indefensible
weakness. The 3rd century B.C. saw in its first half the close of
Epicurus' activity, and the life-work of Chrysippus, the refounder of
Stoicism, is complete before its close. And subsequent variations seem
to have been of a negligible where not of an eclectic character. In
the case of Epicureanism we can happily judge of the tyranny of the
literal tradition by a comparison of Lucretius with the recorded
doctrine of the master. But the rule apparently obtains throughout
that stereotype and compromise offer themselves as the exhaustive
alternative. This is perhaps fortunate for the history of doctrine,
for it produces the commentator, your Aspasius or Alexander of
Aphrodisias, and the substitute for the critic, your Cicero, or your
Galen with his attempt at comprehension of the Stoic categories and
the like while starting from Aristotelianism. Cicero in particular is
important as showing the effect or philosophical eclecticism upon
Roman cultivation, and as the often author and always popularizer of
the Latin terminology of philosophy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account