For the parallels: let it be required to describe the parallel whose
co-latitude is u; take pm = pn = u, and let m´n´ be the projections of
m and n on oPa; then m´n´ is the minor axis of the ellipse
representing the parallel. Its centre is of course midway between m´
and n´, and the greater axis is equal to mn. Thus the construction is
obvious. When pm is less than pa the whole of the ellipse is to be
drawn. When pm is greater than pa the ellipse touches the circle in
two points; these points divide the ellipse into two parts, one of
which, being on the other side of the meridian plane aqr, is
invisible. Fig. 6 shows the complete orthographic projection.
[Illustration: FIG. 7.]
_Stereographic Projection._--In this case the point of vision is on the
surface, and the projection is made on the plane of the great circle
whose pole is V. Let kplV (fig. 7) be a great circle through the point
of vision, and ors the trace of the plane of projection. Let c be the
centre of a small circle whose radius is cp = cl; the straight line pl
represents this small circle in orthographic projection.
[Illustration: FIG. 8.]
We have first to show that the stereographic projection of the small
circle pl is itself a circle; that is to say, a straight line through
V, moving along the circumference of pl, traces a circle on the plane
of projection ors. This line generates an oblique cone standing on a
circular base, its axis being cV (since the angle pVc = angle cVl);
this cone is divided symmetrically by the plane of the great circle
kpl, and also by the plane which passes through the axis Vc,
perpendicular to the plane kpl. Now Vr·Vp, being = Vo sec kVp·Vk cos
kVp = Vo·Vk, is equal to Vs·Vl; therefore the triangles Vrs, Vlp are
similar, and it follows that the section of the cone by the plane rs
is similar to the section by the plane pl. But the latter is a circle,
hence also the projection is a circle; and since the representation of
every infinitely small circle on the surface is itself a circle, it
follows that in this projection the representation of small parts is
strictly similar. Another inference is that the angle in which two
lines on the sphere intersect is represented by the same angle in the
projection. This may otherwise be proved by means of fig. 8, where Vok
is the diameter of the sphere passing through the point of vision, fgh
the plane of projection, kt a great circle, passing of course through
V, and ouv the line of intersection of these two planes. A tangent
plane to the surface at t cuts the plane of projection in the line rvs
perpendicular to ov; tv is a tangent to the circle kt at t, tr and ts
are any two tangents to the surface at t. Now the angle vtu (u being
the projection of t) is 90° - otV = 90° - oVt = ouV = tuv, therefore
tv is equal to uv; and since tvs and uvs are right angles, it follows
that the angles vts and vus are equal. Hence the angle rts also is
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account