(a) The errors of scale of the extreme parallels may be made equal and
may be equated to the error of scale of the parallel of maximum error
(which is near the mean parallel).
(b) Or the errors of scale of the extreme parallels may be equated to
that of the mean parallel. This is not so good a projection as (a).
(c) Or the absolute errors of the extreme and mean parallels may be
equated.
(d) Or in the last the parallel of maximum error may be considered
instead of the mean parallel.
(e) Or the mean length of all the parallels may be made correct. This is
equivalent to making the total area between the extreme parallels
correct, and must be combined with another condition, for example, that
the errors of scale on the extreme parallels shall be equal.
We will now discuss (a) above, viz. a conical projection with
rectified meridians and two standard parallels, the scale errors of
the extreme parallels and parallel of maximum error being equated.
Since the scale errors of the extreme parallels are to be equal,
h(z + c) h(z + c´) c´ sin c - c sin c´
-------- - 1 = --------- - 1, whence z = ------------------- (i.)
sin c sin c´ sin c´ - sin c
The error of scale along any parallel (near the centre), of which the
co-latitude is b is
1 - {h(z + b)/sin b}. (ii.)
This is a maximum when
(tan b) - b = z, whence b is found.
Also
h(z + b) h(z + c)
1 - -------- = -------- - 1 whence h is found. (iii.)
sin b sin c
For the errorless parallels of co-latitudes [gamma] and [gamma]´ we
have
h = (z + [gamma])/sin [gamma] = (z + [gamma]´)/sin [gamma]´.
If this is applied to the case of a map of South Africa between the
limits 15° S. and 35° S. (see fig. 16) it will be found that the
parallel of maximum error is 25° 20´; the errorless parallels, to the
nearest degree, are those of 18° and 32°. The greatest scale error in
this case is about 0.7%.
In the above account the earth has been treated as a sphere. Of course
its real shape is approximately a spheroid of revolution, and the
values of the axes most commonly employed are those of Clarke or of
Bessel. For the spheroid, formulae arrived at by the same principles
but more cumbrous in shape must be used. But it will usually be
sufficient for the selection of the errorless parallels to use the
simple spherical formulae given above; then, having made the selection
of these parallels, the true spheroidal lengths along the meridians
between them can be taken out of the ordinary tables (such as those
published by the Ordnance Survey or by the U.S. Coast and Geodetic
Survey). Thus, if a1, a2, are the lengths of 1° of the errorless
parallels (taken from the tables), d the true rectified length of the
meridian arc between them (taken from the tables),
h = {(a2 - a1)/d}180/[pi],
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account