where M, the modulus of common logarithms, = 0.434294. Of course
Mercator's projection was not originally arrived at in the manner
above described; the description has been given to show that
Mercator's projection is a particular case of the conical orthomorphic
group. The introduction of the projection is due to the fact that for
navigation it is very desirable to possess charts which shall give
correct local outlines (i.e. in modern phraseology shall be
orthomorphic) and shall at the same time show as a straight line any
line which cuts the meridians at a constant angle. The latter
condition clearly necessitates parallel meridians, and the former a
continuous increase of scale as the equator is departed from, i.e. the
scale at any point must be equal to the scale at the equator × sec.
latitude. In early days the calculations were made by assuming that
for a small increase of latitude, say 1´, the scale was constant, then
summing up the small lengths so obtained. Nowadays (for simplicity the
earth will be taken as a sphere) we should say that a small length of
meridian ad[phi] is represented in this projection by a sec [phi]
d[phi], and the length of the meridian in the projection between the
equator and latitude [phi],
/[phi]
/ a sec [phi] d[phi] = a log_e tan (45° + ½[phi]),
\/ 0
which is the direct way of arriving at the law of the construction of
this very important projection.
Mercator's projection, although indispensable at sea, is of little
value for land maps. For topographical sheets it is obviously
unsuitable; and in cases in which it is required to show large areas
on small scales on an orthomorphic projection, that form should be
chosen which gives two standard parallels (Lambert's conical
orthomorphic). Mercator's projection is often used in atlases for maps
of the world. It is not a good projection to select for this purpose
on account of the great exaggeration of scale near the poles. The
misconceptions arising from this exaggeration of scale may, however,
be corrected by the juxtaposition of a map of the world on an
equal-area projection.
It is now necessary to revert to the general consideration of conical
projections.
It has been shown that the scales of the projection (fig. 23) as
compared with the sphere are p´q´/pq = dp/dz = [sigma] along a
meridian, and p´r´/pr´ = [rho]h / sin z = [sigma]´ at right angles to
a meridian.
Now if [sigma][sigma]´ = 1 the areas are correctly represented, then
h[rho] d[rho] = sin z dz, and integrating ½h[rho]² = C - cos z; (i.)
this gives the whole group of _equal-area conical projections_.
As a special case let the pole be the centre of the projected
parallels, then when
z = 0, [rho] = 0, and const = 1, we have p = 2 sin ½z/[delta]h (ii.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account