Here let AB be the direction of the beach, A the nearest point to the
boat O, and B the point he wishes to reach. Clearly he must land, if
at all, between A and B. Suppose he lands at P. Let the angle AOP be
[theta], so that OP = a sec[theta], and PB = b - a tan [theta]. If his
rate of rowing is V miles an hour his time will be a sec [theta]/V +
(b - a tan [theta]) sin [alpha]/V hours. Call this T. Then to the
first power of [delta][theta], [delta]T = (a/V) sec²[theta] (sin
[theta] - sin [alpha])[delta][theta], so that if AOB > [alpha],
[delta]T and [delta][theta] have opposite signs from [theta] = 0 to
[theta] = [alpha], and the same signs from [theta] = [alpha] to
[theta] = AOB. So that when AOB is > [alpha], T decreases from [theta]
= 0 to [theta] = [alpha], and then increases, so that he should land
at a point distant a tan [alpha] from A, unless a tan [alpha] > b.
When this is the case, [delta]T and [delta][theta] have opposite signs
throughout the whole range of [theta], so that T decreases as [theta]
increases, and he should row direct to B. In the first case the
minimum value of T is also a critical value; in the second case it is
not.
The greatest and least values of the bending moments of loaded rods
are often at the extremities of the divisions of the rods and not at
points given by critical values.
In the case of a function of several variables, X1, x2, ... x_n, not
independent but connected by m functional relations u1 = 0, u2 = 0,
..., u_m = 0, we might proceed to eliminate m of the variables; but
Lagrange's "Method of undetermined Multipliers" is more elegant and
generally more useful.
We have [delta]u1 = 0, [delta]u2 = 0, ..., [delta]u_m = 0. Consider
instead of [delta]u, what is the same thing, viz., [delta]u +
[lambda]1[delta]u1 + [lambda]2[delta]u2 + ... + [lambda]_m[delta]u_m,
where [lambda]1, [lambda]2, ... [lambda]_m, are arbitrary multipliers.
The terms of the first order in this expression are
__ [delta]u __ [delta]u1 __ [delta]u_m
\ --------- [delta]x1 + [lambda]1 \ --------- [delta]x1 + ... + [lambda]_m \ ---------- [delta]x1.
/__ [delta]x1 /__ [delta]x1 /__ [delta]x1
We can choose [lambda]1, ... [lambda]_m, to make the coefficients of
[delta]x1, [delta]x2, ... [delta]x_m, vanish, and the remaining
[delta]x_(m+1) to [delta]x_n may be regarded as independent, so that,
when u has a critical value, their coefficients must also vanish. So
that we put
[delta]u [delta]u1 [delta]u_m
---------- + [lambda]1 ---------- + ... + [lambda]_m ---------- = 0
[delta]x_r [delta]x_r [delta]x_r
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account