complaints preferred at the diet of Mainz in 1517 about the
administration of Germany. Leaving the diet, he travelled to Wels in
Upper Austria, where he died on the 12th of January 1519. He was buried
in the church of St George in Vienna Neustadt, and a superb monument,
which may still be seen, was raised to his memory at Innsbruck.
Maximilian had many excellent personal qualities. He was not handsome,
but of a robust and well-proportioned frame. Simple in his habits,
conciliatory in his bearing, and catholic in his tastes, he enjoyed
great popularity and rarely made a personal enemy. He was a skilled
knight and a daring huntsman, and although not a great general, was
intrepid on the field of battle. His mental interests were extensive.
He knew something of six languages, and could discuss art, music,
literature or theology. He reorganized the university of Vienna and
encouraged the development of the universities of Ingolstadt and
Freiburg. He was the friend and patron of scholars, caused manuscripts
to be copied and medieval poems to be collected. He was the author of
military reforms, which included the establishment of standing troops,
called _Landsknechte_, the improvement of artillery by making cannon
portable, and some changes in the equipment of the cavalry. He was
continually devising plans for the better government of Austria, and
although they ended in failure, he established the unity of the
Austrian dominions. Maximilian has been called the second founder of
the house of Habsburg, and certainly by bringing about marriages
between Charles and Joanna and between his grandson Ferdinand and
Anna, daughter of Ladislaus, king of Hungary and Bohemia, he paved the
way for the vast empire of Charles V. and for the influence of the
Habsburgs in eastern Europe. But he had many qualities less desirable.
He was reckless and unstable, resorting often to lying and deceit, and
never pausing to count the cost of an enterprise or troubling to adapt
means to ends. For absurd and impracticable schemes in Italy and
elsewhere he neglected Germany, and sought to involve its princes in
wars undertaken solely for private aggrandizement or personal
jealousy. Ignoring his responsibilities as ruler of Germany, he only
considered the question of its government when in need of money and
support from the princes. As the "last of the knights" he could not
see that the old order of society was passing away and a new order
arising, while he was fascinated by the glitter of the medieval empire
and spent the better part of his life in vague schemes for its
revival. As "a gifted amateur in politics" he increased the disorder
of Germany and Italy and exposed himself and the empire to the jeers
of Europe.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account